1956
DOI: 10.2307/1419084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Constant-Sum Method Applied to Scaling Subjective Dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relation between the ratio scale and the category scale was typical of the relation found on prothetic continua. (For these first results, see Stevens, 1961a; for an earlier related study, see Dudek & Baker, 1956. ) The next study was an exercise in which two students, C. S. Harris and J. P. McMahon,asked 12 Os to judge the smoothness of the stimuli instead of the roughness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The relation between the ratio scale and the category scale was typical of the relation found on prothetic continua. (For these first results, see Stevens, 1961a; for an earlier related study, see Dudek & Baker, 1956. ) The next study was an exercise in which two students, C. S. Harris and J. P. McMahon,asked 12 Os to judge the smoothness of the stimuli instead of the roughness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Quantitative and qualitative data can be processed on a ratio scale, which makes the method useful for verifying objectivity through the process of secondary processing of data [27,28]. CSS provides a consistent fixed total score to respondents and divides the score according to the relative importance of the attributes within the total score [29]. The score used for the total fixed scale is usually 10 or 100 based on the number of factors and indicators.…”
Section: Methodology For Assigning Weightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scaling method. The constant-sum method has been utilized with some success in connection with the scaling of various kinds of subjective and psychophysical dimensions (Baker & Dudek, 1955, 1957Dudek & Baker, 1956). Details of the procedure are reported by Baker and Dudek (1955, pp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%