1995
DOI: 10.1177/0092070395232003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Consumer Retail Search Process: A Conceptual Model and Research Agenda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
99
3
8

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
99
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This reasoning is supported by theories on processing fluency ("the subjective experience of ease with which people process information;" Alter & Oppenheimer, 2009, p. 219), which show that familiar stimuli are processed more fluently than new stimuli (Jacoby & Dallas, 1981;Schwarz, 2004;Weaver et al, 2007;Winkielman et al, 2003). A large body of research in fields as diverse as environmental psychology, architecture, marketing, and consumer behavior has consistently concluded that familiarity improves a person's performance on navigational tasks (Bryant, 1982;Chebat et al, 2005;Dogu & Erkip, 2000;Gärling et al, 1983;Hölscher et al, 2006;O'Neill, 1992;Prestopnik & Roskos-Ewoldsen, 2000;Titus & Everett, 1995;. Iyer (1989) and Park et al (1989) argued that customers without repetitive shopping experiences in a store will attend to a larger number of in-store cues in their navigation than customers who are familiar with the store's layout.…”
Section: Visual Attention Toward In-store Signage During Navigation Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This reasoning is supported by theories on processing fluency ("the subjective experience of ease with which people process information;" Alter & Oppenheimer, 2009, p. 219), which show that familiar stimuli are processed more fluently than new stimuli (Jacoby & Dallas, 1981;Schwarz, 2004;Weaver et al, 2007;Winkielman et al, 2003). A large body of research in fields as diverse as environmental psychology, architecture, marketing, and consumer behavior has consistently concluded that familiarity improves a person's performance on navigational tasks (Bryant, 1982;Chebat et al, 2005;Dogu & Erkip, 2000;Gärling et al, 1983;Hölscher et al, 2006;O'Neill, 1992;Prestopnik & Roskos-Ewoldsen, 2000;Titus & Everett, 1995;. Iyer (1989) and Park et al (1989) argued that customers without repetitive shopping experiences in a store will attend to a larger number of in-store cues in their navigation than customers who are familiar with the store's layout.…”
Section: Visual Attention Toward In-store Signage During Navigation Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signage stimuli also facilitate navigation (Hölscher et al, 2006, O'Neill, 1991Passini, 1984;Peponis et al 1990;Titus & Everett, 1995;Weisman, 1981). Sorensen (2009) found that 80 percent of shoppers' in-store time is spent navigating and the remaining 20 percent is spent deciding which items to purchase; on this basis, it is likely that customers will be exposed to, and influenced by, signage material during both the navigation and decisionmaking stages of the in-store search process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such in-store accessibility is related to store attributes such as manoeuvrability within the outlet, which has also been considered a driver of store satisfaction and patronage in previous work on shopping by the elderly (JohnsonHillery & Kang, 1997;Meneely et al, 2008). Manoeuvrability within a store is related to the possibility of efficient and effective movement and navigation, that is, whether shoppers can manoeuvre through the store without problems, whether they can do so safely and quickly, and whether they can easily find the products they are looking for (Titus & Everett, 1995).…”
Section: Hypotheses and Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Navigation is capable of effi ciently reducing the cost of search for the product to be bought (Hoque & Lohse, 1999). Thus, the structure of the online environment can provide information on the location of the sites off ering the products that consumers desire with an adequate and easy-to-understand layout (Titus & Everett, 1995;Weisman, 1981;Evans, Skorpanich Garling, Bryant & Bresolin, 1984). Thus, it is expected that people who have a greater desire for choice of alternative forms of navigation would perceive the shopping process or the media ease of use as being more profi table.…”
Section: Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%