A B S T R A C TTaylor dispersion analysis (TDA) is an analytical method that has so far mainly been utilized to determine the diffusion coefficient of small molecules, and proteins. Due to increasing interest in nanoscience, some research has been done on the applicability of TDA towards characterizing nanoparticles. This work aims to expand this knowledge and give insight into the range for which TDA can be used for nanoparticle characterization, focusing on various materials and sizes. The TDA setup shown in this work was successful in characterizing all engineered metallic, non-metallic nanoparticles, and proteins tested in this work. Results were compared to dynamic light scattering and electron microscopy, and were in good agreement with both methods. Taking into consideration the wide range of nanoparticle sizes that can be characterized, the minimal sample preparation, and sample volume, required and the simplicity of the method, TDA can be considered as a valuable technique for nanoparticle characterization.When looking at the huge array of properties that nanoparticles (NPs) possess, it is not surprising that they have found their way into a multitude of scientific research areas, and industrial applications [1]. Interesting NP phenomena are mostly governed by their size, and for many applications it is imperative that the NPs not only have a very specific size but also display a narrow particle size distribution [2]. For example, the heating properties of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs), which are being investigated as mediators of hyperthermia in cancer treatment, are dependent on their size and size distribution. Therefore, the characterization of nanoparticle size is crucial to ensure their functionality [3]. For this purpose, several analytical methods such as dynamic light scattering (DLS), NP tracking analysis (NTA), UV-Vis spectroscopy, field-flow fractionation, analytical ultracentrifugation, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) have been utilized to characterize NP sizes and size distributions [4][5][6][7][8]. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages, and a combination of techniques is typically recommended to adequately characterize NPs [4]. For example, TEM provides information about NP core sizes, but cannot evaluate NP hydrodynamic diameters. Conversely, DLS and NTA can evaluate particle hydrodynamic diameter and colloidal stability, but are limited by the quality of light scattering and require a deeper knowledge of the theory and model-fitting to properly analyze the raw data. With scattering-based techniques, the limit of detection for NPs depends on the sensitivity of the detection of scattered light, and factors such as the material refractive index, particle size, shape and the wavelength used for detection. Furthermore, standard DLS measurements struggle with analyzing NPs in complex environments (e.g. proteincrowded suspensions, high particle concentration etc.) or samples where only limited sample preparation is possible [9][10][11]. There are pos...