“…The protein engineering method to study the mutation effects on AcP unfolding and aggregation has been actively applied to describe amyloid fibril formation as well as protein structure–function relationships. ,,− Dobson and co-workers have systematically reported the effects of single point mutations of AcP and found that V9A, E29D, A30G, S87T, and S92T mutations showed increased aggregation rate, whereas V20A, G34A, V39A, L89A, Y91Q, and Y98Q mutations displayed the opposite result. ,, Among those mutations, A30G accelerates and Y91Q decelerates the aggregation rate most distinctively. ,, On the other hand, both of those mutations contribute to slow down the folding rate of AcP with respect to the wild type. , Despite the extensive mutation experiments on AcP protein, the molecular origin and the structural motifs to promote the aggregation and folding rate changes have not been rationalized at the atomic-level due to the absence of the AcP mutant structures. Flöck et al have previously performed the molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for AcP monomer of its wild type under 25% (v/v) trifluoroethanol (TFE)/water solvent and found the enhancement of aggregation propensity mainly due to the TFE and β-propensity of the α1-helix (residues 22–33) .…”