2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Contribution of Common and Specific Therapeutic Factors to Mindfulness-Based Intervention Outcomes

Abstract: While Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBIs) have been shown to be effective for a range of patient populations and outcomes, a question remains as to the role of common therapeutic factors, as opposed to the specific effects of mindfulness practice, in contributing to patient improvements. This project used a mixed-method design to investigate the contribution of specific (mindfulness practice-related) and common (instructor and group related) therapeutic factors to client improvements within an MBI. Particip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). An additional possible limitation can be taken from Canby et al (2021), who showed that instructor -and group -related factors play a role in the therapeutic effects of MBIs. Naturally, a group formed at the beginning of a global pandemic may share the common cohesive experience of difficulty that could positively contribute to the program's overall effect.…”
Section: And Instructormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…). An additional possible limitation can be taken from Canby et al (2021), who showed that instructor -and group -related factors play a role in the therapeutic effects of MBIs. Naturally, a group formed at the beginning of a global pandemic may share the common cohesive experience of difficulty that could positively contribute to the program's overall effect.…”
Section: And Instructormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although positive outcomes remained high, despite the worsening of the pandemic, it is not clear whether the gains would be sustained for extended periods without further structured support (e.g., group setting and instructor). An additional possible limitation can be taken from Canby et al (2021) , who showed that instructor – and group – related factors play a role in the therapeutic effects of MBIs. Naturally, a group formed at the beginning of a global pandemic may share the common cohesive experience of difficulty that could positively contribute to the program’s overall effect.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One plausible explanation for more improvements after treatment is the request that participants in the MBCT-A group report their mindfulness home practice in a WeChat group on a daily basis, which could have promoted engagement. It is widely accepted that for MBI participants, there is a significant association between the extent of practice and positive intervention outcomes [ 43 ],especially concerning anxiety [ 44 ]. In contrast, in the CBT-A group, weekly homework was handed in to the therapists and discussed in the following session.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally the social self – or the self in relation to others, or as part of a group – was only briefly discussed in the section on self-transcendence. Given that many forms of self-hood, both conceptual and embodied, can be influenced by both culture and group membership ( Canby et al, 2020 ), the impacts of MBIs through social dimensions of self deserve more attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%