2003
DOI: 10.1159/000072837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The contribution of <i>cis</i>-elements to disease-associated repeat instability: clinical and experimental evidence

Abstract: Alterations in the length (instability) of gene-specific microsatellites and minisatellites are associated with at least 35 human diseases. This review will discuss the various cis-elements that contribute to repeat instability, primarily through examination of the most abundant disease-associated repetitive element, trinucleotide repeats. For the purpose of this review, we define cis-elements to include the sequence of the repeat units, the length and purity of the repeat tracts, the sequences flanking the re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
135
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 325 publications
(445 reference statements)
2
135
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the comparison disclosed highly significant differences and strong effect of the CAG length in the somatic mosaicism, assessed either as mosaicism index (MI) or as peak numbers (F(1,243)¼131.57, P¼0.00, ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test, 20-26 vs 27-31 CAG range, MI ± SEM: 0.00 ± 0.016, 0.385 ± 0.028, respectively, P¼0.000) (Supplementary Figures S3a and b). According to our current results with regard to the differences between somatic mosaicism and the known phenotypic range of SCA2, we extended the previous comparison to a cohort of 551 alleles with the following ranges: normal (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26), large (27)(28)(29)(30)(31), intermediate (32)(33)(34) and expanded . In addition to the differences in normal CAG repeat ranges, the levels of somatic mosaicism of 32-34 CAG alleles were lower than those observed in the full penetrant expanded alleles (35-79 CAG) (MI±SEM: 0.632±0.11 and 2.51±0.25, respectively, P¼0.000) (Figures 3a-c).…”
Section: Large Ans Are Somatically Unstablementioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the comparison disclosed highly significant differences and strong effect of the CAG length in the somatic mosaicism, assessed either as mosaicism index (MI) or as peak numbers (F(1,243)¼131.57, P¼0.00, ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test, 20-26 vs 27-31 CAG range, MI ± SEM: 0.00 ± 0.016, 0.385 ± 0.028, respectively, P¼0.000) (Supplementary Figures S3a and b). According to our current results with regard to the differences between somatic mosaicism and the known phenotypic range of SCA2, we extended the previous comparison to a cohort of 551 alleles with the following ranges: normal (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26), large (27)(28)(29)(30)(31), intermediate (32)(33)(34) and expanded . In addition to the differences in normal CAG repeat ranges, the levels of somatic mosaicism of 32-34 CAG alleles were lower than those observed in the full penetrant expanded alleles (35-79 CAG) (MI±SEM: 0.632±0.11 and 2.51±0.25, respectively, P¼0.000) (Figures 3a-c).…”
Section: Large Ans Are Somatically Unstablementioning
confidence: 84%
“…Previously, it has been stated that longer alleles in the normal range present a higher probability of pathogenic expansion than do shorter alleles. 32,33 Therefore, this makes more likely the contribution of the former group to the onset of de novo mutations. In this state, IAs with 32-35 CAG repeats that may have evolved from large ANs with 23-31 CAG repeats are intermediates, which in successive generations would give rise to full penetrant alleles (37-79 CAG) associated with SCA2, ALS, 34 FTDP-U, 34 or pure parkinsonism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6B). When wild type protein was used, the FEN cleavage products (17,16, and 15 nt) can be observed, followed by EXO cleavage products (10 -14 nt), which increase in intensity as the reaction progresses. When E176A is used, only FEN cleavage products are observed, along with a low fraction of EXO cleavage products.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo studies of TNR stability have taken advantage of model systems in Escherichia coli, yeast, mice, and cell lines. Processes implicated in repeat tract instability include replication slippage, the direction of replication fork progression, lagging strand errors, Okazaki fragment processing, mismatch repair, gap filling, double strand break repair, and recombination (17). These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive, and any combination of them may result in significant TNR expansion and a disease phenotype in higher organisms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these processes exposes single strands of repeats, which can form secondary structures such as hairpins and slipped-strand duplexes (10,41), which are thought to be the key intermediates that trigger repeat instability. As if that were not enough diversity, additional identified contributors to instability include epigenetic modifications, chromatin structure, and local sequence effects (4,7). Thus, the molecular details of repeat instability, especially the number of relevant pathways and the interconnections among them, are not yet clear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%