2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00347-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The contribution of the insula to motor aspects of speech production: A review and a hypothesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
188
2
11

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
16
188
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The left anterior insula furthermore has not only been related to articulatory speech programming [Dronkers, 1996] and to automatization of lexical retrieval [Van Turennout et al, 2000], but also to auditory speech processing and verbal working memory [Augustine, 1996]. Ackermann and Riecker [2004] suggested that the anterior insular cortex is involved in speech-motor control because they found no activity in covert speech. Similarly, we did not find strong activity in the insula in the covert-naming condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The left anterior insula furthermore has not only been related to articulatory speech programming [Dronkers, 1996] and to automatization of lexical retrieval [Van Turennout et al, 2000], but also to auditory speech processing and verbal working memory [Augustine, 1996]. Ackermann and Riecker [2004] suggested that the anterior insular cortex is involved in speech-motor control because they found no activity in covert speech. Similarly, we did not find strong activity in the insula in the covert-naming condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results, however, suggest that their roles in stuttering may be different. During normal speech, the insula was found to constribute to the actual coordination of articulatory movement (Ackermann and Riecker, 2004). Importantly, the right insula also has a similar role as the left tempo-parietal region, i.e., the AG (BA39), in aiding the coordination and evaluation of task performance across behavioral tasks with varying perceptual and response demands (Eckert et al, 2008).…”
Section: The Neural Substrates For Atypical Execution Process In Stutmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These authors argued that many of the asymmetries in both audition and vision result from a preferred role for the left and right hemispheres in processing relatively high and low frequencies, respectively, in the senses of both pitch and spatial frequency. The hemispheric asymmetry within the dimension of time has been developed by many authors, including Ackermann and Riecker (2004), Allard and Scott (1975), Deacon (1997), Ivry and Robertson (1998, Chapter 6), Tallal (1980), and Zatorre, Belin, and Penhune, (2002). We shall refer to this idea as the Asymmetric Sampling in Time (AST) theory, the name ascribed to it by Poeppel (2003).…”
Section: The Lateralization Of Frequency and Timementioning
confidence: 99%