1995
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00761-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The control of sialyltransferase activity in tumor‐cell lines derived from different tissues is multifactorial

Abstract: The activities of the sialyltransferase enzymes and the resulting expression of sialoglycoproteins were examined in tumor cells derived from different tissues in order to gain a greater understanding of the factors controlling the cell glycosylation state. Cell-cell contact, which is dependent on cell confluency state, was shown to influence glycosylation in the neurallyderived mouse neuro-2A neuroblastoma and the C6 glioma cell lines. Both showed a relatively high level of cell sialyltransferase activity unde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What is clearly evident from the comparison of glycosylation signatures generated in our study and that previously reported [Tao et al, 2008] is that the glycosylation status of commonly used cell lines cultured in different laboratories varies significantly. Many factors may influence the glycans displayed on cell surfaces, including sugar concentration in the growth media [Hossler et al, 2009], passage number [Coughlan and Breen, 1995], cell density [Senechal et al, 1983; Coughlan and Breen, 1995] and the serum used [Hossler et al, 2009]. Given that changes in cell surface glycosylation may significantly impact on the validity of data generated from cell‐based assays using common laboratory cell lines, we suggest that regular evaluation of glycosylation signatures be undertaken, either using lectin array technology or flow cytometry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is clearly evident from the comparison of glycosylation signatures generated in our study and that previously reported [Tao et al, 2008] is that the glycosylation status of commonly used cell lines cultured in different laboratories varies significantly. Many factors may influence the glycans displayed on cell surfaces, including sugar concentration in the growth media [Hossler et al, 2009], passage number [Coughlan and Breen, 1995], cell density [Senechal et al, 1983; Coughlan and Breen, 1995] and the serum used [Hossler et al, 2009]. Given that changes in cell surface glycosylation may significantly impact on the validity of data generated from cell‐based assays using common laboratory cell lines, we suggest that regular evaluation of glycosylation signatures be undertaken, either using lectin array technology or flow cytometry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precipitate was hydrolysed with 3N HCl for 4 h at 100°C. Similarly, a known amount of delipidized residues of tissues prepared according to the method of Folsch et al (1951) were hydrolysed with 3 N HCl as above. The hydrolysed materials were neutralized and aliquots were used for the estimation of hexose (Niebus, 1972), hexosamine (Wagner, 1979) and sialic acid (Warren, 1959).…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased activity of sialyl transferase leads to increased expression of sialic acid in hepatoma (Coughlan and Breen, 1995) which may be one of the requisites of neoplastic cells helping malignancy. O'Kennedy et al (1991) suggested that the shedding of sialic acid from the surface of tumour cells may be involved in the blockage of the immune system.…”
Section: Glycoprotein Changes During Hcc and Drug Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%