1990
DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90142-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The controlling sequence for site-specific chromosome breakage in tetrahymena

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
102
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we could not find any correlation between MAC chromosome size and G+C content in the T. thermophila somatic genome (R 2 = 0.027), using the 125 scaffolds from the draft genome assembly that are capped by telomeres at both ends (Supplemental Table S3 from Eisen et al 2006). This is consistent with our model, since MAC chromosome fragmentation results from site-specific cleavage of the germline DNA in Tetrahymena (Yao et al 1990) and there does not appear to be any correlation between the sizes of the ∼225 MAC chromosomes and the size of the five MIC chromosomes from which they derive, judging from available assignment of telomere-capped MAC scaffolds to MIC linkage groups (Supplemental Fig. 4 from Eisen et al 2006).…”
Section: Germline Chromosomessupporting
confidence: 78%
“…First, we could not find any correlation between MAC chromosome size and G+C content in the T. thermophila somatic genome (R 2 = 0.027), using the 125 scaffolds from the draft genome assembly that are capped by telomeres at both ends (Supplemental Table S3 from Eisen et al 2006). This is consistent with our model, since MAC chromosome fragmentation results from site-specific cleavage of the germline DNA in Tetrahymena (Yao et al 1990) and there does not appear to be any correlation between the sizes of the ∼225 MAC chromosomes and the size of the five MIC chromosomes from which they derive, judging from available assignment of telomere-capped MAC scaffolds to MIC linkage groups (Supplemental Fig. 4 from Eisen et al 2006).…”
Section: Germline Chromosomessupporting
confidence: 78%
“…1A; refs. [17][18][19]. This mechanism seems to be shared by other unicellular eukaryotes, as short IR sequences also facilitate palindrome formation in yeast, either following a DSB (20) or when MRE11 is mutated (21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The wild-type 156 and s mutant strains have the same micronuclear genome, yet telomeres rcproducibly form at different positions of the G gene sequence at each autogamy. Whether or not the G gene macronuclear telomere is produced by a breakage of the micronuclear chromosome during macronuclear development, the different telomere positions in the two strains cannot be determined by a cis-acting element such as the chromosome breakage sequence (Cbs) recently identified in Tetrahymena (Yao et al 1990). Clearly, in this case, another mechanism is involved in the positioning of the telomeres, which is determined by the old macronucleus rather than by the micronuclear sequence.…”
Section: Influence Of the Macronucleus On The Processing Of The Macromentioning
confidence: 99%