1989
DOI: 10.1051/m2an/1989230405971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The convergence of a Galerkin approximation scheme for an extensible beam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us apply relations (27) together with (31) and (33) in (29). In addition, we take into consideration definitions (15) and (25). Computations yield…”
Section: Formula For N 1 and Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let us apply relations (27) together with (31) and (33) in (29). In addition, we take into consideration definitions (15) and (25). Computations yield…”
Section: Formula For N 1 and Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The projection and difference methods, various iteration processes, Greenâs function method and other methods and numerical experiments were performed. One can get acquainted with these and other numerical approaches to the solution of the corresponding problems in the works of S. Bilbao [6], M. Chipot [7], S. M. Choo et al [8], T. Geveci, I. Christie [15], T. Gudi [16], N. Kachakhidze et al [22], T. F. Ma [27], J. Peradze [33][34][35][36], J. Rogava, M. Tsiklauri [40], J. Sladek, V. Sladek [41]. The interest in Kirchhoff class equations is of a permanent nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geveci and Christie [69] examined the stability and convergence of a semidiscrete PEG method and two fully discrete Crank-Nicols on-type methods for the approximate solution of the undamped extensible beam equation [171] Utt…”
Section: One Dimensional Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Galerkin approximation for a nonlinear extensible beam was studied by Geveci and Christie [5]. Choo and Chung [6] proposed a finite difference approximation to the solution of a strongly damped extensible beam equation and, in [7], error estimates were obtained for a finite element approximation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%