Abstract:We define the operation of convolution, which associates with a partial Steiner triple system and an abelian group a new partial Steiner triple system, and we determine conditions under which some fundamental geometric properties remain invariant under the operation of convolution.
“…Each y ∈ {0, 1, 2} yields the For every 3-element line L the structure L C 2 is a Veblen configuration (cf. [8]). Therefore, each line L of P n yields a Veblen subconfiguration of M n = P n C 2 (comp 2.3).…”
Section: Proposition 311mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8]) that a Veblen subconfiguration of M n either has the form L C 2 , or it is a suitably indexed Veblen subconfiguration of P n . In view of 3.2, the class of Veblen subconfigurations of M n is the set V = {L C 2 : L is a line of P n }.…”
“…Each y ∈ {0, 1, 2} yields the For every 3-element line L the structure L C 2 is a Veblen configuration (cf. [8]). Therefore, each line L of P n yields a Veblen subconfiguration of M n = P n C 2 (comp 2.3).…”
Section: Proposition 311mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8]) that a Veblen subconfiguration of M n either has the form L C 2 , or it is a suitably indexed Veblen subconfiguration of P n . In view of 3.2, the class of Veblen subconfigurations of M n is the set V = {L C 2 : L is a line of P n }.…”
“…In another representation, R is the convolution R = G 2 (X ) C 2 of the combinatorial Grassmannian and the group C 2 , where |X | = n (cf. [10]). Let us consider an embedding ν of R into the projective space PG(n, 2); as in 2.6, every Veblen subconfigu- [10]) then the obtained structure of improper points is the convolution H 2 (X ) C 2 enlarged by a single point and a family of n 4 lines through this point.…”
We study substructures of a projective space PG(n, 2) represented in terms of elementary combinatorics of finite sets, which generalize the Sylvester's representation of the generalized quadrangle of order (2, 2). Their synthetic properties are established and automorphisms are characterized.
“…Such a generalization was introduced e.g. in [12] (reducts of even more general type were studied in [5,10]). Let A = F n , L, be the n-dimensional (analytical) affine space defined over a division ring F. For 1 ≤ t < n we denote by H t the family of the t-hyperplanes of A.…”
Section: Generalizations Reducts Of Affine Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us fix L ∈ H k for some integer 1 ≤ k < n. After that let us define L * = {M ∈ L: L M } and L = L \ L * . The structure AS(n, k, F) = A− − (∅, L * ) = F n , L was called in [12] an affine slit space 1 . Let H t be the class of the t-dimensional strong subspaces of AS(n, k, F); clearly, H t ⊂ H t .…”
Section: Generalizations Reducts Of Affine Spacesmentioning
We discuss basic properties of the affine slit spaces and give elementary axiomatic characterizations of reducts of affine, Desarguesian affine, and Pappian affine planes.
Mathematics Subject Classification (2000). 51A15, 51A30, 51A45.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.