2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00022-006-0051-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The convolution of a partial Steiner triple system and a group

Abstract: We define the operation of convolution, which associates with a partial Steiner triple system and an abelian group a new partial Steiner triple system, and we determine conditions under which some fundamental geometric properties remain invariant under the operation of convolution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

4
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each y ∈ {0, 1, 2} yields the For every 3-element line L the structure L C 2 is a Veblen configuration (cf. [8]). Therefore, each line L of P n yields a Veblen subconfiguration of M n = P n C 2 (comp 2.3).…”
Section: Proposition 311mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each y ∈ {0, 1, 2} yields the For every 3-element line L the structure L C 2 is a Veblen configuration (cf. [8]). Therefore, each line L of P n yields a Veblen subconfiguration of M n = P n C 2 (comp 2.3).…”
Section: Proposition 311mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8]) that a Veblen subconfiguration of M n either has the form L C 2 , or it is a suitably indexed Veblen subconfiguration of P n . In view of 3.2, the class of Veblen subconfigurations of M n is the set V = {L C 2 : L is a line of P n }.…”
Section: Proposition 311mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another representation, R is the convolution R = G 2 (X ) C 2 of the combinatorial Grassmannian and the group C 2 , where |X | = n (cf. [10]). Let us consider an embedding ν of R into the projective space PG(n, 2); as in 2.6, every Veblen subconfigu- [10]) then the obtained structure of improper points is the convolution H 2 (X ) C 2 enlarged by a single point and a family of n 4 lines through this point.…”
Section: Example 26mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a generalization was introduced e.g. in [12] (reducts of even more general type were studied in [5,10]). Let A = F n , L, be the n-dimensional (analytical) affine space defined over a division ring F. For 1 ≤ t < n we denote by H t the family of the t-hyperplanes of A.…”
Section: Generalizations Reducts Of Affine Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us fix L ∈ H k for some integer 1 ≤ k < n. After that let us define L * = {M ∈ L: L M } and L = L \ L * . The structure AS(n, k, F) = A− − (∅, L * ) = F n , L was called in [12] an affine slit space 1 . Let H t be the class of the t-dimensional strong subspaces of AS(n, k, F); clearly, H t ⊂ H t .…”
Section: Generalizations Reducts Of Affine Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%