2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The coordination of stakeholder interests in environmental regulation: Lessons from China’s environmental regulation policies from the perspective of the evolutionary game theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(5) When the platform-leading enterprise A and the related cooperative enterprise B are in a state of cooperation, the two sides create value together, and the innovation ecosystem is developing towards a virtuous path. When one performs noncooperative behavior, it is difficult for both to create value together, and there will be many contradictions, even dissolution [40]. (6) e response of a relevant cooperative enterprise B is crucial to the choice of a platform-leading enterprise A. erefore, the strategic choice of both is a dynamic game process, and the best strategy is cooperation, which can maximize benefits, increase the overall profit of the innovation ecosystem, and minimize the total costs and risk [41].…”
Section: Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) When the platform-leading enterprise A and the related cooperative enterprise B are in a state of cooperation, the two sides create value together, and the innovation ecosystem is developing towards a virtuous path. When one performs noncooperative behavior, it is difficult for both to create value together, and there will be many contradictions, even dissolution [40]. (6) e response of a relevant cooperative enterprise B is crucial to the choice of a platform-leading enterprise A. erefore, the strategic choice of both is a dynamic game process, and the best strategy is cooperation, which can maximize benefits, increase the overall profit of the innovation ecosystem, and minimize the total costs and risk [41].…”
Section: Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies show that the appropriate policies can promote green innovation [17,24]. The right policies should coordinate the interests of the central government, local governments, and enterprises according to various influencing factors [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, the coal purchase plan and power generation technology innovation in the power industry also affect coal companies' production capacity. However, the existing related researches, which mainly focus on the game between the central government, local governments, and coal enterprises [21][22][23], lack the investigation of external factors such as the market supply and demand environment [24]. In this respect, this paper uses evolutionary game theory to contemplate the intensity of carbon emission reduction and coal market demand after technological upgrading in the coal and power industries, and studies the behavioral strategy relationship and dynamic evolution mechanism among the three-party game players of the local government, power industry, and coal enterprises under different constraint scenarios so as to provide a theoretical reference for the government to regulate and control related policy systems and help coal companies to break through the dilemma of overcapacity with the goal of low-carbon development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%