1982
DOI: 10.1080/01418618208239906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The core structures of a ⅓〈1123〉{1122} edge dislocation under applied shear stresses in an h.c.p. model crystal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
3
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
17
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study here shows notable differences as compared to previous simulations at 0 K. In the previous simulations [1,3,[8][9][10][11][12][13], PI and PII screw and Type I, II and III edge cores were observed, whereas we did not observe the Type II edge core and found a new P0 screw core and new IC, IT, IIIC, IIIT and III 0 edge cores. The behavior of dislocations under applied stresses also differs between this work and the prior work.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our study here shows notable differences as compared to previous simulations at 0 K. In the previous simulations [1,3,[8][9][10][11][12][13], PI and PII screw and Type I, II and III edge cores were observed, whereas we did not observe the Type II edge core and found a new P0 screw core and new IC, IT, IIIC, IIIT and III 0 edge cores. The behavior of dislocations under applied stresses also differs between this work and the prior work.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…In previous simulations, three type of edge hc + ai cores were observed with various Mg and Zr potentials [1,3,[8][9][10][11][12][13]. In the present simulations, the Type II core that consists of two ½ hc + ai partials lying in the (1 1 À2 2) plane was not observed, even when using initial configurations with dissociated partials separated by up to 8a.…”
Section: Edge Dislocationscontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies reported inconsistencies between the stable SF predicted by the standard γ-lines and the SF and dislocation dissociations found by direct atomistic calculations [7,8]. A recent DFT study on c + a dislocation core structures in Mg also shows a significant difference in partial core separation between the direct simulations and the predictions of elasticity theory using the stable SF energy computed by the standard approach [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…В результате компьютерного моделирования [70][71][72] были полу-чены многочисленные формы ядра краевой (c  a)-дислокации, кото-рые включают релаксацию ядра, образование высокоэнергетическо-го поверхностного дефекта при расщеплении в плоскости пирамиды II, образование низкоэнергетического дефекта упаковки при рас-щеплении в плоскости базиса и т.д. В результате, если опустить де-тали, остаются следующие формы краевой (c  a)-дислокации: недис-социированная (стянутая) форма; ядро, диссоциированное (разма-занное) в исходной плоскости пирамиды II; ядро, диссоциированное (размазанное) в плоскости базиса и пересекающихся с ней плоско-стях.…”
Section: соотношения между характерными временами и автоблокировкаunclassified