2009
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The CoRoT-7 planetary system: two orbiting super-Earths

Abstract: We report on an intensive observational campaign carried out with HARPS at the 3.6 m telescope at La Silla on the star CoRoT-7. Additional simultaneous photometric measurements carried out with the Euler Swiss telescope have demonstrated that the observed radial velocity variations are dominated by rotational modulation from cool spots on the stellar surface. Several approaches were used to extract the radial velocity signal of the planet(s) from the stellar activity signal. First, a simple pre-whitening proce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

22
323
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(350 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
22
323
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The velocity jitter is barely correlated with log R HK , or with the FWHM and the bisector of the CCF. The correlation between the FWHM and log R HK is different from the observations made for example in the case of the spotted star CoRoT-7, for which those two values are rather anti-correlated (Queloz et al 2009). Also, the apparent correlation between log R HK and the radial velocity jitter is different from the picture seen in the cases of the active stars HD 166435 (Queloz et al 2001), GJ 674 (Bonfils et al 2007) or HD 189733 (Boisse et al 2009).…”
Section: Fit With Stellar Activitycontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The velocity jitter is barely correlated with log R HK , or with the FWHM and the bisector of the CCF. The correlation between the FWHM and log R HK is different from the observations made for example in the case of the spotted star CoRoT-7, for which those two values are rather anti-correlated (Queloz et al 2009). Also, the apparent correlation between log R HK and the radial velocity jitter is different from the picture seen in the cases of the active stars HD 166435 (Queloz et al 2001), GJ 674 (Bonfils et al 2007) or HD 189733 (Boisse et al 2009).…”
Section: Fit With Stellar Activitycontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Bonfils et al 2007;Forveille et al 2009), or transiting planets (e.g. Bouchy et al 2008;Queloz et al 2009). The essential Based on observations made with HARPS spectrograph on the 3.6-m ESO telescope at La Silla Observatory, Chile, under the programs ID 072.C-0488, 074.C-0364 and 078.C-0044.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This instrument was designed to discover and study in detail exoplanets for which the transits are difficult or impossible to detect from the ground. This concerns specifically small planets or "Super-Earths" (Léger et al 2009;Queloz et al 2009), i.e., planets orbiting more active stars, e.g., CoRoT2b, ) and with longer periods, e.g., CoRoT-4b, (Aigrain et al 2008;Moutou et al 2008). It is relatively easy for CoRoT to detect larger planets, similar in size to Jupiter, and a number of these have also been reported The CoRoT space mission, launched on December 27, 2006, has been developed and is being operated by CNES, with the contribution of Austria, Belgium, Brazil, ESA, The Research and Scientific Support Department of ESA, Germany and Spain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore capable of detecting transiting planets with periods in excess of 50d. With the launch of CoRoT, which provides essentially uninterrupted and long time sequences, the detection of small planets with radii only a few times the radius of the Earth has become possible (Léger et al 2009;Queloz et al 2009). For exoplanets, the visual magnitude range observable by CoRoT is about 11-16.5 and the photometric precision is close to the photon noise in the upper half of this range (Auvergne et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its obtained mass combined with radial velocity measurements is M = 4.8 ± 0.8 M ⊕ (Queloz et al 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%