2014
DOI: 10.1057/jdg.2014.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Corporate Gini Index (CGI) determinants and advantages: Lessons from a multinational retail company case study

Abstract: This article identifies and compares the determinants of CEO compensation to median employee earnings with those of the Corporate Gini Index (CGI). Using a multinational retail company, the article posits that the CGI is an advantageous corporate alternative pay inequality measure that concerns CEO pay multiples to median employee earnings, which regulators should consider using and disclosing in proxy statements. Although CGI and the official measure of multiples of CEO pay to median employee earnings share s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most direct evidence for hierarchical organization comes from firm case studies [57][58][59][60][61][62]. Fig 2 shows the hierarchical structure of six case-study firms (which come from Britain, the Netherlands, Portugal, and the United States).…”
Section: Institution Size and Hierarchymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most direct evidence for hierarchical organization comes from firm case studies [57][58][59][60][61][62]. Fig 2 shows the hierarchical structure of six case-study firms (which come from Britain, the Netherlands, Portugal, and the United States).…”
Section: Institution Size and Hierarchymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…properties of the distribution tail are captured by a single parameter-the power-law exponent. Since Pareto's initial discovery, the power-law scaling of top incomes has been re-confirmed many times (for a non-exhaustive list, see [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]). What causes this nearly universal behavior?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Average income vs. hierarchical power within case-study firms Note: This figure shows data from six firm case studies (Audas et al, 2004;Baker et al, 1993;Dohmen et al, 2004;Lima, 2000;Morais and Kakabadse, 2014;Treble et al, 2001). The vertical axis shows average income within each hierarchical level of the firm (relative to the base level), while the horizontal axis shows my metric for average power, which is equal to one plus the average number of subordinates below a given hierarchical level.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%