2009
DOI: 10.1097/ijg.0b013e318179f751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Correlation Between Visual Field Defects and Focal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured With Optical Coherence Tomography in the Evaluation of Glaucoma

Abstract: Analysis of RNFL thickness in eyes with focal glaucomatous visual field defects showed good structural and functional correlation with OCT. OCT contributes to the identification of focal defects in the RNFL of glaucoma patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were found in C. Ajtony et al 9 (77.99 ± 17.06) study, but not with that of Yalvac IS et al 12 (62.90 ± 16.56) and Sujatasubbiah et al 10 studies.…”
Section: Rnfl Analysis By Oct Average Rnfl Thicknesssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Similar results were found in C. Ajtony et al 9 (77.99 ± 17.06) study, but not with that of Yalvac IS et al 12 (62.90 ± 16.56) and Sujatasubbiah et al 10 studies.…”
Section: Rnfl Analysis By Oct Average Rnfl Thicknesssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…[2][3][4][5][6]12,14,[16][17][18] However, most of these studies used the Stratus time Correlation of localized glaucomatous VF defects and SD-OCT RNFL thinning H Wu et al domain OCT to measure RNFL thickness. [2][3][4]6,13,14,16,17 Although in two of these studies, SD-OCT was used to evaluated RNFL thickness, 5,18 the structure-function correspondence maps made in those studies correlated VF test points to regions of the ONH. In the present study, we created a modified OCT-based structurefunction map that shows significant correlation between localized areas of VF loss and SD-OCT measurements of RNFL thinning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAP provides a few parameters (ie, raw threshold values (VF sensitivity), total deviation values, pattern deviation values, MD, and PSD), but which are best fit for functional assessments and statistical analyses? In previous structure-function relationship studies where localized VF defects were correlated to RNFL thickness changes, VF parameters used included mean raw threshold values, 2,9,12,14,15,17 total deviation values, 1,[3][4][5]13,16,18 and pattern deviation values. 16 Total deviation values, which are age-corrected, are less influenced by age than raw threshold values, and they may be more sensitive to detect early diffuse loss compared with pattern deviation values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations