2006
DOI: 10.1080/10408340500526766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Correlation Coefficient: An Overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
482
0
17

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,001 publications
(504 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
5
482
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…43,44 These results shown in Table 4 indicate that correlations between antioxidant activity and total content of bioactive compounds assays exhibit differences. It was observed that the correlation coefficient (r = 0.87) between the FRAP and deoxyribose antioxidant assays was significantly different (P < .001) and similarly for the FRAP and ABTS assays (r = 0.9105, P < .001) and for deoxyribose and ABTS assays (r = 0.873, P < .001).…”
Section: Ramos-escudero Et Almentioning
confidence: 81%
“…43,44 These results shown in Table 4 indicate that correlations between antioxidant activity and total content of bioactive compounds assays exhibit differences. It was observed that the correlation coefficient (r = 0.87) between the FRAP and deoxyribose antioxidant assays was significantly different (P < .001) and similarly for the FRAP and ABTS assays (r = 0.9105, P < .001) and for deoxyribose and ABTS assays (r = 0.873, P < .001).…”
Section: Ramos-escudero Et Almentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The correlation observed between the ACE inhibitors' renal elimination data and their in silico molecular descriptors (lipophilicity parameter (AClogP) and constitutional parameter (molecular mass) or geometric descriptor (volume value)) can be considered good, as proposed by Asuero et al (34), due to the limited number of compounds. These correlations confirmed the calculation of descriptors as the technique suitable for evaluation of renal elimination of the selected compounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, when the correlation coefficient values reach at least 0.999 the linearity can be assumed in the concentration range for which standard solutions had been prepared during the calibration procedure. However, this parameter is mostly used, but correlation coefficient (r) is neither a proof of linearity nor suitable for quantitative measurement [19,25,[48][49][50][51][52]. Correlation coefficient (r) just indicates the extent of the relationship between the dependent and independent variables such as the electroanalytical response and the electroactive compound concentration.…”
Section: Linearitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lack of significance means that there are no detectable general matrix effects either in pharmaceutical dosage forms or in biological samples. If the calibration is not linear, a more complex technique for significance tests [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][48][49][50][51][52]. However, using the electroanalytical methods this kind of interferences are not detected because of the electro-inactive nature of the excipients of pharmaceuticals and most of the endogenous substances of biological media.…”
Section: Linearitymentioning
confidence: 99%