2002
DOI: 10.1360/02tb9017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The correlation of flare?s location on solar disc and the sudden increase of total electron content

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameters of this flare indicate that the angular distance of the flare is 85°W and is larger than the angular distances of the other two flares that occurred on 6 November 1997 and on 14 July 2000. So this result is in agreement with the conclusions made previously [ Donnelly , 1969, 1971, 1976; Matsoukas et al , 1972; Afraimovich et al , 2001c, 2002; Zhang et al , 2002b].…”
Section: Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The parameters of this flare indicate that the angular distance of the flare is 85°W and is larger than the angular distances of the other two flares that occurred on 6 November 1997 and on 14 July 2000. So this result is in agreement with the conclusions made previously [ Donnelly , 1969, 1971, 1976; Matsoukas et al , 1972; Afraimovich et al , 2001c, 2002; Zhang et al , 2002b].…”
Section: Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 94%
“…By analyzing the correlation of solar radio bursts and SITEC of the ionosphere, Matsoukas et al [1972] obtained similar results. More recently, using TEC derived from IGS network during the flares of the different X‐ray classes, Afraimovich et al [2001c, 2002] and Zhang et al [2002b] also studied the relationship between the TEC increases and the flares' parameters, and similar results were obtained. The parameters of this flare indicate that the angular distance of the flare is 85°W and is larger than the angular distances of the other two flares that occurred on 6 November 1997 and on 14 July 2000.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The time and amplitude of the peak response are determined by peak solar irradiance (e.g., Afraimovich 2000;Zhang et al 2002Zhang et al , 2011Le et al 2007). However, because of the large mass and high heat capacity in the thermosphere, the neutral gas response to a solar flare would be sluggish with regard to transient enhancement in solar EUV flux; that is, it needs longer time for neutral gas to react to the increase in solar EUV flux, and the neutral gas response also can last a longer time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ionospheric effects of solar flares, or sudden ionospheric disturbances (SID), have been studied since 1960s owing to their effects on radio communications and navigation systems. Most previous studies related to solar flares have so far focused on the ionospheric responses (e.g., Afraimovich 2000; Leonovich et al 2002;Liu et al 2004Liu et al , 2006Mahajan et al 2010;Tsurutani 2005;Wan et al 2005;Zhang et al 2002;Zhang and Xiao 2005;Le et al 2007Le et al , 2011Le et al , 2013Liu et al 2011). Compared to the research on the ionospheric responses to solar flares, the study on the thermospheric responses to solar flares is relatively scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsurutani et al (2005) revealed that the EUV spectrum of the 28 October flare is much different from the other flares, namely in the wavelength range 260-340Å that flare is larger by more than a factor of two. The relatively weak EUV emission of the limb flare on 4 November is due to a strong center-to-limb effect for the EUV (Donnelly, 1976) and, thus, the ionospheric impact of the limb flare should also be smaller (Zhang et al, 2002b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%