2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07335-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cost-Effectiveness of Nicotine Replacement Therapy Sampling in Primary Care: a Markov Cohort Simulation Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine the similarity between sequences, we used OrthoMCL (Table S 6 ) clustering analysis to perform all-VS-All BLAST alignment on gene protein-coding sequences of all selected species (e-value = 1e-5 by default) [ 64 ]. Markov clustering algorithm was used for clustering analysis (expansion coefficient is 1.5), and the clustering results distinguished between the endemic and common genes, as depicted by the Venn diagram [ 64 , 65 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the similarity between sequences, we used OrthoMCL (Table S 6 ) clustering analysis to perform all-VS-All BLAST alignment on gene protein-coding sequences of all selected species (e-value = 1e-5 by default) [ 64 ]. Markov clustering algorithm was used for clustering analysis (expansion coefficient is 1.5), and the clustering results distinguished between the endemic and common genes, as depicted by the Venn diagram [ 64 , 65 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current trial was not focused on cost-effectiness outcomes, but a separate analysis of a prior trial of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) sampling, using similar methods as those herein, demonstrated actual cost-savings. 35 Whether the same is true for e-cigarettes is unclear, but one might speculate that roughly comparable cost between NRT and e-cigarettes and superior outcomes (e-cigarettes > NRT), the same might hold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there is not a clear path for paying for NRT samples through insurance United States reimbursement structures, although, if effective, NRTS may be cost‐saving for countries with socialized medicine. In primary care, NRTS cost $75 and was associated with a lifetime reduction of healthcare expenditures of $1065 34 . Evidence that NRTS is effective in oral healthcare could be used to advocate for policies to allow healthcare settings to provide point of care medication samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In primary care, NRTS cost $75 and was associated with a lifetime reduction of healthcare expenditures of $1065. 34 Evidence that NRTS is effective in oral healthcare could be used to advocate for policies to allow healthcare settings to provide point of care medication samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%