2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40258-020-00613-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cost-Effectiveness of Pulmonary Rehabilitation for COPD in Different Settings: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to usual care, pulmonary rehabilitation leads to substantial improvements in dyspnea, exercise capacity, and health status [ 25 ]. Furthermore, when provided following hospitalizations for COPD exacerbation, it has pronounced benefit in reducing subsequent hospitalization and mortality risk [ 55 ], and referral leads to projected favorable benefit–cost analyses, both from a systematic review [ 56 ], and across different health care settings in the United Kingdom [ 57 ].…”
Section: Telemedicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to usual care, pulmonary rehabilitation leads to substantial improvements in dyspnea, exercise capacity, and health status [ 25 ]. Furthermore, when provided following hospitalizations for COPD exacerbation, it has pronounced benefit in reducing subsequent hospitalization and mortality risk [ 55 ], and referral leads to projected favorable benefit–cost analyses, both from a systematic review [ 56 ], and across different health care settings in the United Kingdom [ 57 ].…”
Section: Telemedicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were unable to identify any previously published cost-effectiveness analyses of PR for patients with COPD in the US health care system, although our findings are supported by numerous non-US studies (eTable 2 in the Supplement). [16][17][18][19] A systematic review by Liu et al 33 found that PR was cost-effective across a variety of settings, including outpatient and home-based rehabilitation and telerehabilitation. 33 Although it is reassuring that these prior results are consistent with our present findings, our study has several important differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19] A systematic review by Liu et al 33 found that PR was cost-effective across a variety of settings, including outpatient and home-based rehabilitation and telerehabilitation. 33 Although it is reassuring that these prior results are consistent with our present findings, our study has several important differences. In addition to including routinely reported costs of PR, rehospitalization, and ED use, [17][18][19]34 we included the costs of SNF days, which to date have been reported infrequently (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants hypothesised that if the intervention improves health outcomes, it may save the healthcare system money in the long-term. This hypothesis is supported for in-person interventions and some eHealth interventions for people with chronic diseases [41][42][43][44]. A recent economic analysis of a 6-month lifestyle-focused text message intervention for secondary prevention of CVD found that reduced hospitalisations due to interventioninduced health improvements could save the government nearly $10Million [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%