2022
DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cost-effectiveness of Transplanting Hearts From Hepatitis C-infected Donors Into Uninfected Recipients

Abstract: Background. The DONATE HCV trial demonstrated the safety and efficacy of transplanting hearts from hepatitis C viremic (HCV+) donors. In this report, we examine the cost-effectiveness and impact of universal HCV+ heart donor eligibility in the United States on transplant waitlist time and life expectancy. Methods. We developed a microsimulation model to compare 2 waitlist strategies for heart transplant candidates in 2018: (1) status quo (SQ) and (2) SQ plus HCV+ donors (SQ + HCV). From the DONATE HCV trial an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, six of the studies aimed to measure the cost-effectiveness of increasing the organ pool by accepting the transplant of a hepatitis C virus-positive organ in hepatitis C virus-negative recipients, with appropriate antiviral treatment. All the studies reported increases in QALYs and reductions of the waiting lists with this strategy and considered it to be cost-effective despite the added cost of the antivirals[ 7 - 12 ]. Another strategy for expanding the organ pool involved the introduction of organs from cardiac death donors as well as from brain dead donors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, six of the studies aimed to measure the cost-effectiveness of increasing the organ pool by accepting the transplant of a hepatitis C virus-positive organ in hepatitis C virus-negative recipients, with appropriate antiviral treatment. All the studies reported increases in QALYs and reductions of the waiting lists with this strategy and considered it to be cost-effective despite the added cost of the antivirals[ 7 - 12 ]. Another strategy for expanding the organ pool involved the introduction of organs from cardiac death donors as well as from brain dead donors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Расчеты показывают экономическую эффективность и улучшение клинических исходов среди ВГС-отрицательных пациентов, принявших сердце от инфицированного донора [49][50][51]. Запрет на проведение трансплантаций сердца от ВГС-инфицированных доноров связан с риском инфицирования реципиентов ВГС, которое в случае забора трансплантата от донора с вирусемией (HCVAb+РНК+) и отсутствия последующей ПВТ реципиента происходило практически всегда [52] и сопровождалось развитием васкулопатии трансплантата, плохой выживаемостью трансплантата и реципиента [53,54].…”
Section: трансплантация сердца от доноров с хронической вгс-инфекциейunclassified