2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10198-010-0237-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The costs of breast cancer prior to and following diagnosis

Abstract: This retrospective incidence-based cost-of-illness analysis aims to quantify the costs associated with female breast cancer in Flanders for the year prior to diagnosis and for each of the 5 years following diagnosis. A bottom-up analysis from the societal perspective included direct health care costs and indirect costs of productivity loss due to morbidity and premature mortality. A case-control study design compared total costs of breast cancer patients with costs of an equivalent standardised population with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They reported an incidence number of 6,623, which gives 41,500 € per case, which is only 58% of our 70,800 € estimate. Broekx et al (2010) give an estimated productivity loss of 95,600 € over five years following the diagnosis in Flanders, Belgium, which is substantially higher than our within-cohort 5-year estimate of 28,900 €. These estimates are not directly comparable, however, since the Flanders study included the value of unpaid work including housekeeping activities, which are not included in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They reported an incidence number of 6,623, which gives 41,500 € per case, which is only 58% of our 70,800 € estimate. Broekx et al (2010) give an estimated productivity loss of 95,600 € over five years following the diagnosis in Flanders, Belgium, which is substantially higher than our within-cohort 5-year estimate of 28,900 €. These estimates are not directly comparable, however, since the Flanders study included the value of unpaid work including housekeeping activities, which are not included in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…The welfare gain for the population, in terms of longer and healthier lives, should be the main goal of such programs, but in a cost-effectiveness framework, economic benefit for the society can be interpreted as a reduction in the cost of a prevention program. The effects of breast cancer on macro-economic productivity has previously been studied in other Western-European countries, including Sweden (Lidgren et al, 2007), Flanders (Broekx et al, 2010) and Ireland (Hanly et al, 2012). These studies show that productivity loss is a substantial effect of breast cancer, which makes the issue and important one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study evaluated only direct medical costs and not indirect, lost productivity, or out-of-pocket costs that are not available in the administrative data. Other work has shown that indirect costs are substantial, accounting for well over 50% of the total cost of cancer [17][18][19] . Lastly, it is evident that analyzing data within 2 years after the initial diagnosis might not accurately identify all costs and utilization of breast cancer management, because, for many patients, treatment and survival can extend beyond those 2 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cost is related to anxiety, depression, cancer burden, marriage conflict, social negative change and family relation, and future indeterminacy. The total cost consists of that of productivity loss (89% of it) and health treatment cost (11%) (Broekx et al 2011).…”
Section: Diagram 2 Life Pattern Of Breast Cancer Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%