1997
DOI: 10.1006/jado.1997.0108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The covariation of religion and politics during the transition to young adulthood: challenging global identity assumptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common behavioral change described was attending religious services less frequently, which supports previous findings of decreases in religious attendance at this stage (Johnston et al, 1995). The most commonly described change in faith was a stronger sense of faith, which also supports prior work (De Haan & Schulenberg, 1997;Kotesky et al, 1990). Although the majority of emerging adults may not have been exploring their religion, many who did report changes described changes consistent with religious exploration.…”
Section: Religious Viewssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most common behavioral change described was attending religious services less frequently, which supports previous findings of decreases in religious attendance at this stage (Johnston et al, 1995). The most commonly described change in faith was a stronger sense of faith, which also supports prior work (De Haan & Schulenberg, 1997;Kotesky et al, 1990). Although the majority of emerging adults may not have been exploring their religion, many who did report changes described changes consistent with religious exploration.…”
Section: Religious Viewssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…There is evidence that individuals become more religious as they transition from adolescence to adulthood, including increases in commitment and in intrinsic religiosity (De Haan & Schulenberg, 1997;Kotesky, Walker, & Johnson, 1990;Stolzenberg, Blair-Loy, & Waite, 1995). In contrast, although many emerging adults report that religion is important to them, their attendance at religious services actually decreases (Johnston, Bachman, & O'Malley, 1995).…”
Section: Religiositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Zaff et al (2011) demonstrated increasing mean levels in civic efficacy from grade levels 8 to 11. This finding is plausible since adolescence can be characterized as the period of individual political socialization (De Haan & Schulenberg, 1997;Fend, 1991;Flanagan & Gallay, 1995;Sears & Levy, 2003;Yates & Youniss, 1998). Adolescents are increasingly faced with political issues once political education is introduced as a school subject in secondary school curricula.…”
Section: Development Of Political Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be due to adolescents' critical reviews of political issues which might result from increasing examinations of and reflections on political issues (Wasburn, 1994). Hence, although adolescence can be seen as the peak period of political socialization (De Haan & Schulenberg, 1997;Fend, 1991;Flanagan & Gallay, 1995;Sears & Levy, 2003;Yates & Youniss, 1998 Future studies should be conducted in order to unveil variables contributing to the formation and explanation of constructs of political socialization. In this context, studies should examine the relation between political efficacy and student characteristics whereby both politics-related and general personal characteristics should be taken into account.…”
Section: Practical and Theoretical Implications And Directions For Fumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three types of evidence: low convergence of identity statuses across domains (Fadjukoff, Pulkinen, & Kokko, 2005Goossens, 2001;Solomontos-Kountouri & Hurry, 2008); different developmental trajectories for different domains (Fadjukoff, Pulkinen, & Kokko, 2005Hardy et al, 2010); and identity status in particular domains demonstrates different relations to demographic and psychosocial variables, such as gender, type of school, socio-economic status (Goossens, 2001;Pastorino et al, 1997;Solomontos-Kountouri & Hurry, 2008), and community and religious involvement (Hardy et al, 2010). Given this evidence, assessment of domain-specific identity statuses, either alone or in addition to global identity statuses, is recommended by several authors (e.g., De Haan & Schulenberg, 1997;Goossens, 2001;Hardy et al, 2010;Schwartz, Luyckx, & Crocetti, 2015;Solomontos-Kountouri & Hurry, 2008). McLean, Syed, Yoder, and Greenhoot (2016) contend that it is imprudent to examine processes of identity development in domains that are irrelevant to the people being studied.…”
Section: Erikson's Theory Of Identity Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%