“…There are three types of evidence: low convergence of identity statuses across domains (Fadjukoff, Pulkinen, & Kokko, 2005Goossens, 2001;Solomontos-Kountouri & Hurry, 2008); different developmental trajectories for different domains (Fadjukoff, Pulkinen, & Kokko, 2005Hardy et al, 2010); and identity status in particular domains demonstrates different relations to demographic and psychosocial variables, such as gender, type of school, socio-economic status (Goossens, 2001;Pastorino et al, 1997;Solomontos-Kountouri & Hurry, 2008), and community and religious involvement (Hardy et al, 2010). Given this evidence, assessment of domain-specific identity statuses, either alone or in addition to global identity statuses, is recommended by several authors (e.g., De Haan & Schulenberg, 1997;Goossens, 2001;Hardy et al, 2010;Schwartz, Luyckx, & Crocetti, 2015;Solomontos-Kountouri & Hurry, 2008). McLean, Syed, Yoder, and Greenhoot (2016) contend that it is imprudent to examine processes of identity development in domains that are irrelevant to the people being studied.…”