2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00454-021-00330-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Covering Radius and a Discrete Surface Area for Non-Hollow Simplices

Abstract: We explore upper bounds on the covering radius of non-hollow lattice polytopes. In particular, we conjecture a general upper bound of d/2 in dimension d, achieved by the “standard terminal simplices” and direct sums of them. We prove this conjecture up to dimension three and show it to be equivalent to the conjecture of González-Merino and Schymura (Discrete Comput. Geom. 58(3), 663–685 (2017)) that the d-th covering minimum of the standard terminal n-simplex equals d/2, for every $$n\ge d$$ … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intuition behind this notion is that if we consider the lattice arrangements µK + Z n , for increasing values of µ ≤ μ, then p does not belong to any lattice translate of µK unless µ = μ. This concept is very natural for the investigation of the covering radius and already appeared before, for instance in [8]. Figure 1 illustrates the concept of last-covered points on a covering by triangles and another one by squares.…”
Section: Enter Geometry: a Simpler And Faster Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intuition behind this notion is that if we consider the lattice arrangements µK + Z n , for increasing values of µ ≤ μ, then p does not belong to any lattice translate of µK unless µ = μ. This concept is very natural for the investigation of the covering radius and already appeared before, for instance in [8]. Figure 1 illustrates the concept of last-covered points on a covering by triangles and another one by squares.…”
Section: Enter Geometry: a Simpler And Faster Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intuition behind this notion is that if we consider the lattice arrangements µK + Z n , for increasing values of µ ≤ μ, then p does not belong to any lattice translate of µK unless µ = μ. This concept is very natural for the investigation of the covering radius and already appeared before, for instance in [8].…”
Section: Enter Geometry: a Simpler And Faster Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%