1913
DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1050240204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cranial nerves of siren lacertina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1923
1923
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later in the same study (page 208), he assigned one remaining ramus of the ramus mandibularis to be homologous to the ramus maxillaris of other amphibians. Furthermore, Paterson compared the origin and branching pattern to those in different urodele amphibians ( Siren : Norris ; Proteus : Benedetti 1933; Salamandra : Francis, 1934). He argued that the branching pattern of the ramus maxillaris of X. laevis is more similar to the pattern found in urodeles than in other anurans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later in the same study (page 208), he assigned one remaining ramus of the ramus mandibularis to be homologous to the ramus maxillaris of other amphibians. Furthermore, Paterson compared the origin and branching pattern to those in different urodele amphibians ( Siren : Norris ; Proteus : Benedetti 1933; Salamandra : Francis, 1934). He argued that the branching pattern of the ramus maxillaris of X. laevis is more similar to the pattern found in urodeles than in other anurans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allis [1920] ascribed eight branches to the typical branchial nerve by adding the ramus dorsalis and subdividing the ram us posttrem aticus into four parts. Norris [1924] agreed in principle with A llis' illum inating portrayal of a typical branchial nerve and was of the opinion th at the specific num ber of posttrem atic rami is not significant when they are of similar com position. The arrangem ent of the branches of a typical branchial nerve of A llis as figures by Norris is shown in fig.…”
Section: Fig 2 Reproduction Of Norris'mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The following account of the interrelationships between the cranial nerves and the vertebrate pharynx has been synthesized from the descriptions of Allis [1889Allis [ ,1897Allis [ ,1917Allis [ ,1920Allis [ ,1922Allis [ and 1923, Herrick [1899Herrick [ , 1900Herrick [ , 1901, K n ou ff [1927], Norris (1913Norris ( , 1925 [1890,1892,1903,1904].…”
Section: Structure Of the Vertebrate Pharynxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in an exceptionally thorough analysis and argument, disagrees with this interpretation, and considers the spinal nucleus to be 'nothing else but part of the fore most spinal roots' (p. 341). He cites the fact that the trape zius muscle is innervated by spinal nerves as well as by the spinal component of XI [48], and evidence that the trape zius has a myotomal origin (at this time it was assumed that branchiomeric musculature originated from anterior lateral plate mesoderm). Addens identified a spinal component in fishes, and this was widely ignored by subsequent work…”
Section: The Evolution Of the Vagus And Accessory Nervesmentioning
confidence: 99%