2017
DOI: 10.1201/b11477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Crime Numbers Game

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To be brief, we find minimal scientific evidence to support the claims that police agencies systematically distort their figures or that differences in recording practices make comparing clearances across agencies a fruitless endeavor. Although there is anecdotal evidence and some weak statistical evidence of manipulation (Eterno & Silverman, 2010, 2012; Seidman & Couzens, 1974), the evidence does not come close to indicating that clearance rates are biased to the point Mosher and colleagues suggest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…To be brief, we find minimal scientific evidence to support the claims that police agencies systematically distort their figures or that differences in recording practices make comparing clearances across agencies a fruitless endeavor. Although there is anecdotal evidence and some weak statistical evidence of manipulation (Eterno & Silverman, 2010, 2012; Seidman & Couzens, 1974), the evidence does not come close to indicating that clearance rates are biased to the point Mosher and colleagues suggest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The Compstat programme, developed by the New York Police Department, was notorious for exposing police commanders to management review events where ‘their’ performance was subjected to hostile examination (Eterno and Silverman, 2012; Moore, 2003). In our research we did not find evidence of performance events of the intensity of the Compstat regime; however, we did find that ‘rituals of performance’ (see Manning, 2008; see also Manning, 1997 for policing ‘rituals’) were a key part of contemporary police performance, whereby individuals are exposed to particular events at which the performance of themselves or relevant others is presented, examined, challenged and at which they are called to account.…”
Section: Translating Targets Downwards: the Ambivalence Of Managerialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, policing becomes overly focused on measurable activities, such as criminal detections, rather than other forms of problem-solving which may have no directly measurable outcomes but which are nevertheless socially beneficial, such as ‘partnership policing’ (for England and Wales, Beattie and Cockcroft, 2009; Crawford et al, 2005; de Maillard and Savage, 2012; Hough, 2007; Loveday, 2006; for Australia, Fleming and Scott, 2008). Second, the pursuit of standardized and uniform performance indicators for policing has been associated with the rigidities of the centralization of policing through ‘top–down’ performance governance frameworks (for England and Wales, de Maillard and Savage, 2012; Fitzgerald et al, 2002; Loveday, 2006; for the USA, Eterno and Silverman, 2012; Sparrow, 2015; for France, de Maillard and Mouhanna, 2016). Third, performance management has reinforced a culture of cynicism within police organizations (‘ticking boxes’), increasing the divide between managers and frontline officers (Fitzgerald et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Statistical data are derived from police files, often in instances where there have been witness statements, interviews with victims, and the collection of at least some evidence. Because of these factors, statistical data are generally more accurate than call data (data derived from incidents as reported to the police), although statistical crime data have their own serious deficiencies (Yung, 2014;Eterno & Silverman, 2012;Lomell, 2011). Statistical data typically lack both the realtime dimension and the geographic precision necessary for this type of crime map.…”
Section: The Datamentioning
confidence: 99%