1950
DOI: 10.2307/2086606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Criminal Violation of Financial Trust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
262
2
80

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 312 publications
(353 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
262
2
80
Order By: Relevance
“…In brief, the method involves formulating a hypothesis; comparing the hypothesis against the first case; if it does not fit, reformulating the hypothesis so as to be consistent with the data in the first case; comparing the revised hypothesis against the second case; and so on. According to Cressey (1950Cressey ( , 1953, an important early developer of the approach, "practical certainty may be attained after a small number of cases, but a single negative case requires a reformulation…the procedure continues until a universal relationship is established".…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brief, the method involves formulating a hypothesis; comparing the hypothesis against the first case; if it does not fit, reformulating the hypothesis so as to be consistent with the data in the first case; comparing the revised hypothesis against the second case; and so on. According to Cressey (1950Cressey ( , 1953, an important early developer of the approach, "practical certainty may be attained after a small number of cases, but a single negative case requires a reformulation…the procedure continues until a universal relationship is established".…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the theoretical point of view, the basics were put in this field by the criminologist Donald Cressey, who was the first to examine in 1950 why people commit fraud [3]. Cressey argues that there are three factors leading to fraudulent behavior, namely: perceived unshareable financial need, perceived opportunity and rationalization.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Moreover, individuals at various levels of the corporate hierarchy may have fundamentally different incentives to commit fraud. The triangle theory suggests that fraud can occur if individuals have 1) opportunity, 2) attitude, and 3) incentives, or feel pressured (Cressey, 1950;Trompeter et al, 2012). We therefore distinguish among the various shareholding groups in a company to gauge each group's trade-off between the benefits of committing fraud and the cost of getting caught and punished.…”
Section: H1mentioning
confidence: 99%