2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/1048052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Criterion Validity, Reliability, and Feasibility of an Instrument for Assessing the Nursing Intensity in Perioperative Settings

Abstract: Patient classification systems generate information for staff allocation based on a patient's care needs. This study aims to test further the instrument for assessing nursing intensity (NI) in perioperative settings. Nine operating departments from five university hospitals were involved. The perioperative nurses gathered data from patients (N = 876) representing different fields of surgery. Reliability was tested by parallel classifications (n = 144). Also, the users' (n = 40) opinions were surveyed. The resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This feedback also stands as a significant testament to the instrument's feasibility. 51 This study has strengths and limitations that should be considered when interpreting its contributions to the literature. One limitation is that, although the sample sizes were comparable to those of the original study, the results have focused on the use of ACE-E in a competitive context, whereas the original study was applied in a training context so they may not be directly comparable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feedback also stands as a significant testament to the instrument's feasibility. 51 This study has strengths and limitations that should be considered when interpreting its contributions to the literature. One limitation is that, although the sample sizes were comparable to those of the original study, the results have focused on the use of ACE-E in a competitive context, whereas the original study was applied in a training context so they may not be directly comparable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validitas kriteria dapat diuji dengan menambahkan atau memasukkan item dari skala yang ada sehingga dapat mengukur konstruk yang terkait (Rauta, 2017)…”
Section: Metodologiunclassified
“…Establishing the criterion validity involves the demonstration of a correlation between the new tool and another instrument or standard that is considered as an accurate indicator of the same concept or construct being measured (the gold standard) [ 48 ]. A major disadvantage of this validity is that such a gold standard may not be available or easy to establish, as in the case of Ayurveda.…”
Section: Phases Of Tool Development and Their Implications In Ayurvedamentioning
confidence: 99%