2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cro-Magnon babies: Morphology and mortuary implications of the Cro-Magnon immature remains

Abstract: Although the adult skeletons discovered in 1868 at the Cro-Magnon site (Dordogne, France) have been studied several times, the immature remains known as Cro-Magnon 5 and exhumed at the same time were only analyzed in detail once, some thirty years ago. Since then, doubts have persisted concerning, in particular, the minimum number of immature individuals present in the assemblage. A re-analysis of these immature remains (cranial fragments and long bone diaphyses) documents the presence of three neonates and on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Cussac sample is composed of teenagers and adults with no evidence of infant or juvenile remains. This demographic profile is not uncommon for the Gravettian, but it is for southwestern France, where infants and children are relatively abundant (19,26,27). Cussac L2A displays an unusually small body size and limb proportions, as well as unusual skull morphology, for a Gravettian male (15, 16) (SI Appendix).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The Cussac sample is composed of teenagers and adults with no evidence of infant or juvenile remains. This demographic profile is not uncommon for the Gravettian, but it is for southwestern France, where infants and children are relatively abundant (19,26,27). Cussac L2A displays an unusually small body size and limb proportions, as well as unusual skull morphology, for a Gravettian male (15, 16) (SI Appendix).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although the human skeletal assemblage from the site was described in variable detail by Broca (1868) and Pruner-Bey (1868), and reassessed 100 years later by and Dastugue (1967), these human remains from Cro-Magnon have remained poorly known despite the incorporation of data from them into Late Pleistocene comparative analyses. In this context, and in the framework of a broader refocus on western Eurasian Upper Paleolithic human paleobiology, we have undertaken the reassessment of the Cro-Magnon human remains (Villotte and Balzeau, 2018;Partiot et al, 2020;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although described in relative detail by and Pruner-Bey (1865-75) shortly after their discovery, and reassessed 100 years later by , the human skeletal assemblage from Cro-Magnon has remained poorly known despite the incorporation of various elements into Late Pleistocene comparative analyses. In this context, and in the 3 framework of a broader refocus on western Eurasian Upper Paleolithic human paleobiology, we have undertaken the reassessment of the Cro-Magnon human remains (Thibeault and Villotte, 2018;Villotte and Balzeau, 2018;Partiot et al, 2020;Villotte et al, 2020); in this contribution, we provide a description and reassessment of the dental and alveolar remains of the adults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%