2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.09.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cross-disciplinary emergence of 3D printed bioceramic scaffolds in orthopedic bioengineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of bone reconstruction are dependent on the surgical skills, the quality of the adjacent tissue, the size and location of the bone defect, as well as the method of repairing the bone defect. Current methods of reconstruction include simple or vascularized bone grafts, the use of biomaterials, and, more recently, the use of growth factors to induce osteoinduction [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results of bone reconstruction are dependent on the surgical skills, the quality of the adjacent tissue, the size and location of the bone defect, as well as the method of repairing the bone defect. Current methods of reconstruction include simple or vascularized bone grafts, the use of biomaterials, and, more recently, the use of growth factors to induce osteoinduction [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that the bone tissue taken may require reshaping into custom shapes, which may complicate the surgical operation. Also, complications in the case of simple bone grafts include graft resorption and increased mortality associated with the sampling area [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In regard to tissue engineering of a particular cartilage, although implanting artificial matrices, growth factors, perichondrium, and periosteum can initiate the formation of cartilaginous tissue in osteochondral and chondral defects in synovial fluids, the results vary considerably from patient to patient [16]. A successful scaffold is one that fits the anatomical defects defined from clinical imaging data, while also having a design that is porous and that can balance load bearing and biofactor delivery requirements [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. For these designs, the global image design database is created from a computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) image of a patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%