The Cross-National Relevance of U.S. Formulated Theories of College Student Departure

Abstract

This article focuses on the cross-national relevance of theories of college student departure formulated by U.S. scholars. Some aspects of U.S. developed theories of college student departure hold some semblance of cross-national relevance. Economic and sociological perspectives provide such aspects. The weighing of costs and benefits inherent in the economic perspective appears relevant in the countries of Ghana, Czech Republic, Hungary, and Slovenia where the dual-payment system prevails. Concepts of both the social inequality and interactionalist aspects of the sociological perspective appear relevant cross-nationally. Social inequality in student graduation rates transpires along socioeconomic lines in Ghana and the United Kingdom. Moreover, key aspects of the interactionalist perspective concerning departure from commuting institutions such as support from significant others, the problems associated with commuting, and academic integration appear to differentiate between students who continue their enrollment and those who depart in the countries of Jordan and Turkey.

Dropout from Higher Education in Turkey: A Qualitative Study

“…A student who cannot cover the living expenses of college life, may choose to drop out or to work in a part-time job. Lack of financial support from family and limited scholarship opportunities may cause financial difficulties, and this may be a cause of low academic achievement and eventually dropout (Braxton, 2012;Harvey & Szalkowicz, 2015). According to the participants, financial difficulties, working in a part-time job and academic failure were interrelated as a reason for dropout.…”

What's Missing in Persistence Models? Integrating Basic Needs and Belongingness

“…Building on the work of Spady, Tinto developed the best-known model of institutional departure, which was first published in 1975 and updated in 1994. Reason and Braxton (2023) built on their own individual work to explicate institutional factors that can influence persistence.…”