1973
DOI: 10.1107/s0567740873004796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The crystal and molecular structure of bis(2,4-dithiobiureto)nickel(II) diperchlorate–ethanol, Ni(HDTB)2(ClO4)2.EtOH

Abstract: DERIVED BY R1, Rz, AND R, REFINEMENTS atomic site is only partially occupied, but the partial occupancy is not recognized, and refinement is carried out in the usual way in both RI and R2 with unit weights in each case. The temperature parameters found were too large to be reasonable for the halogen atom in question, and larger for R2 than for RI. As pointed out by another referee, this suggests that deliberately carrying out two refinements with different weighting schemes might reveal the presence of signifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The metal is itself square planar with Ni-S distances [Ni-S(1) 2.1466(9), Ni-S(2) 2.1671( 9) Å] consistent with those in the two other nickel dithiobiurets reported previously [2.150-2.168 Å]. 38,39 The two biuret ligands are not coplanar but form a flattened chair conformation about the metal. The pattern of hydrogen bonds between biuret and thymine shows two strong NH⋯O and a weaker NH⋯N interaction, 32 as has been observed by others in the complex between dithiobiuret and uracil, 38 despite the general preference for thymine to form just two hydrogen bond interactions with its partner.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The metal is itself square planar with Ni-S distances [Ni-S(1) 2.1466(9), Ni-S(2) 2.1671( 9) Å] consistent with those in the two other nickel dithiobiurets reported previously [2.150-2.168 Å]. 38,39 The two biuret ligands are not coplanar but form a flattened chair conformation about the metal. The pattern of hydrogen bonds between biuret and thymine shows two strong NH⋯O and a weaker NH⋯N interaction, 32 as has been observed by others in the complex between dithiobiuret and uracil, 38 despite the general preference for thymine to form just two hydrogen bond interactions with its partner.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The Ni-S distances (2.17 A) agree well with those observed for the neutral Ni(DTB)2 complex (2-17 A) (Pignedoli, Peyronel & Antolini, 1972) and for the Ni(HDTB)~ ÷ cation (average 2.16 .~) (Pignedoli, Peyronel & Antolini, 1973). The inter-chelate S-S distances (3.01 ,~) are well within the range postulated by Steifel, Dori & Gray (1967) as indicative of some residual S-S inter-chelate bonding.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In previous work we determined the crystal structures of some nickel(II) complexes with thio-amidic ligands: the neutral complex Ni(II)bis-(N,N'-di-n-propyldithiocarbamate), Ni-(DPDTC)2 (Peyronel & Pignedoli, 1967) with a fourmembered ring, the neutral complex Ni(DTB)2 in the bis-(2,4-dithiobiureto)nickel(II)-glycol compound (Pignedoli, Peyronel & Antolini, 1972) and the cationic complex Ni(HDTB) 2+ in the bis-(2,4-dithiobiureto)-nickel(II)-diperchlorate-ethanol compound (Pignedoll, Peyronel & Antolini, 1973) both having a sixmembered ring. We were therefore interested in determining the structure of the bis-(2,3-quinoxalinedithiolato)nickelate(lI) anion, Ni(qdt) 2-, having a five-membered ring and we chose for this study the tetraethylammonium salt, less cumbersome than the tetrabutylammonium salt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the first crystal structure of this type of complex, since only dithiobiuret derivative complexes are known. [37][38][39][40][41][42] The nickel atom in 4 is coordinated in a square planar geometry by four sulfur atoms (see Figure 8). The ligand backbone is tilted out of the coordination plane by 22°.…”
Section: S Terminalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NiÀ S distances are ranging from 2.165(5) Å to 2.169(7) Å, which is comparable to literature known complexes. [37][38][39][40][41][42]…”
Section: S Terminalmentioning
confidence: 99%