1981
DOI: 10.1246/bcsj.54.1247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Crystal Structure of Di-μ-Bromo-tris(triphenylphosphine)dicopper(II)

Abstract: The crystal structure of the Cu2Br2(PPh3)3·1.5C6H6 complex has been determined by three dimensional X-ray analysis. The crystals are monoclinic, and the space group is P21/c, with unit-cell parameters of a=14.122 (3), b=19.573 (4), c=25.985 (7) Å, β=128.99 (1)°, and Z=4. In the Cu2Br2(PPh3)3 molecule, one copper atom is three-coordinate, and the other, four-coordinate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
3
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[2] The lengths of the CuÀP bonds in 4 (2.282(2) and 2.304(2) ) and 5 (2.294(2) and 2.300(2) ) are slightly shorter than those in [{(triphos)CoP 3 } 2 Cu]PF 6 (triphos = 1,1,1-tris(diphenylphosphanylmethyl)ethane; 2.303(2)-2.360-(2) ), [6] whereas those of 6 (2.312 (1) ) lie within this range. The Cu À X bond lengths (2.348(2) and 2.360(2) (4); 2.472(1) and 2.481 (1) (5); 2.606(1) and 2.668 (1) (6)) are within the range of those reported for the compounds [Cu 2 -(PPh 3 ) 3 X 2 ] (X= Cl [7] 2.247(4)-2.454(4) , Br [8] 2.370(2)-2.610(2) , I [9] 2.500(2)-2.819 (1) ). The structures of the polymer cores are compared in Figure 4.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…[2] The lengths of the CuÀP bonds in 4 (2.282(2) and 2.304(2) ) and 5 (2.294(2) and 2.300(2) ) are slightly shorter than those in [{(triphos)CoP 3 } 2 Cu]PF 6 (triphos = 1,1,1-tris(diphenylphosphanylmethyl)ethane; 2.303(2)-2.360-(2) ), [6] whereas those of 6 (2.312 (1) ) lie within this range. The Cu À X bond lengths (2.348(2) and 2.360(2) (4); 2.472(1) and 2.481 (1) (5); 2.606(1) and 2.668 (1) (6)) are within the range of those reported for the compounds [Cu 2 -(PPh 3 ) 3 X 2 ] (X= Cl [7] 2.247(4)-2.454(4) , Br [8] 2.370(2)-2.610(2) , I [9] 2.500(2)-2.819 (1) ). The structures of the polymer cores are compared in Figure 4.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The crystal structures of triphenylphosphine Cu I halide complexes were chosen to be representative of a well-known and thoroughly investigated system composed of monodentate trivalent phosphorus ligands and Cu I salts, thus representing a wealth of different structures that, in principle, are also possible for phosphor-A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G amidite copper complexes. The structures shown in Figure 4d, [29] e, [30] and g [31] are indeed very similar to the known crystal structures of the phosphoramidite copper complexes discussed in the introduction. For the 1:1 ligand-to-copper salt ratios, the situation is more complicated.…”
Section: Nmr Diffusion Measurementssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The Cu−P bonds of 5 (2.288(1) and 2.297(1) Å) are slightly shorter than those in [{(triphos)CoP 3 } 2 Cu]PF 6 ⋅2 THF (2.360(2), 2.320(2), 2.303(2), and 2.329(2) Å). The Cu−Br bond of 5 (2.466(1) Å) is within the range displayed by the bromide‐bridged complex [Cu 2 (PPh 3 ) 3 Br 2 ] (2.370(2)–2.610(2) Å) 15. The formation of 5 shows on the one hand the different coordination behavior of the Mo 2 P 2 complex 1 with CuBr compared to the cyclo ‐P 3 complexes [(triphos)M( η 3 ‐P 3 )] (M=Co, Rh, or Ir) with CuBr 6.…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%