2000
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The crystal structure of staphylococcal enterotoxin H: implications for binding properties to MHC class II and TcR molecules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One interpretation of the cytotoxicity assays as well as competition experiments is that SEH directly interacts with TCR to cause this expansion. The V␣ specificity of SEH contradicts all previously published data on T cell stimulation by superantigens, but SEH still has to be regarded as a bacterial superantigen since it exhibits all other characteristics of the protein family; e.g., like a similar three-dimensional fold (13), the ability to bind MHC class II (21,36), potent T cell mitogen properties (36), and the ability to induce acute toxic shock in mammals (50). A striking difference between SEH and other SEs is, however, the incapability of SEH to induce T cell activation in mice (37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…One interpretation of the cytotoxicity assays as well as competition experiments is that SEH directly interacts with TCR to cause this expansion. The V␣ specificity of SEH contradicts all previously published data on T cell stimulation by superantigens, but SEH still has to be regarded as a bacterial superantigen since it exhibits all other characteristics of the protein family; e.g., like a similar three-dimensional fold (13), the ability to bind MHC class II (21,36), potent T cell mitogen properties (36), and the ability to induce acute toxic shock in mammals (50). A striking difference between SEH and other SEs is, however, the incapability of SEH to induce T cell activation in mice (37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The sequential assignment of the SEH protein was reported elsewhere 20 . According to the chemical shift index, the structural integrity of the SEH protein in solution shows no deviation from the reported crystal structures 16,20 . An NMR study of the transient interaction between SEH and the TCR was performed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…2a), with a total root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 1.2 Å calculated using secondary structure matching (SSM), where differences in the TCRβ chain contribute the most. Overall, the structural rearrangements upon complex formation are rather small; hence, the different proteins included in the complex are analogous with the uncomplexed structures [16][17][18] . SEH has an N-terminal OB-fold comprising of the β-strands β 1 -β 5 and one α-helix (α 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, zinc may indirectly participate in the interactions between SAgs and host receptors, by inducing conformational changes in certain SAgs; such changes could facilitate the binding of such SAgs to their receptors. Although direct evidence to support this hypothesis is lacking, comparisons of crystal structures of several SAgs with/without Zn 2+ indeed revealed that there are conformational changes associated with Zn 2+ binding (Baker et al, 2004a;Hakansson et al, 2000;Papageorgiou et al, 2004). In addition, although there is currently no evidence to support the following possibility, zinc could be required for interactions with co-stimulatory receptors for T-cell activation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%