2023
DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.12486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cultural influence on employees' preferences for reward allocation rules: A two‐wave survey study in 28 countries

Abstract: Multinational organisations and government organisations experienced problems introducing a merit pay system in different countries. Designing the right reward system is challenging in an international work environment, because employees often have different expectations about reward allocations. Most prior research predicted that individualistic employees prefer equity as allocation rule for rewards, while collectivistic employees prefer equality as allocation rule. However, prior research could not confirm t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 185 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Justice is considered a universal need (Beugré, 2007; Leung & Tong, 2004; Patel, Salih, & Hamlin, 2019), but its definition, interpretation, and implementation can differ across countries (Beugré, 2007; Leung, 2005; Leung & Tong, 2004). Employees with different cultural values could have different expectations about justice (Adamovic, 2023; Beugré, 2007; Steiner, 2001; Taras & Rowney, 2008), so their justice evaluations of events and entities would depend on their cultural and national background. To expand cross‐cultural justice research, future research could investigate whether employees from different countries use different justice norms to evaluate justice in the workplace (Adamovic, 2023; Olsen, 2015).…”
Section: A Research Agenda For Organizational Justice Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Justice is considered a universal need (Beugré, 2007; Leung & Tong, 2004; Patel, Salih, & Hamlin, 2019), but its definition, interpretation, and implementation can differ across countries (Beugré, 2007; Leung, 2005; Leung & Tong, 2004). Employees with different cultural values could have different expectations about justice (Adamovic, 2023; Beugré, 2007; Steiner, 2001; Taras & Rowney, 2008), so their justice evaluations of events and entities would depend on their cultural and national background. To expand cross‐cultural justice research, future research could investigate whether employees from different countries use different justice norms to evaluate justice in the workplace (Adamovic, 2023; Olsen, 2015).…”
Section: A Research Agenda For Organizational Justice Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employees with different cultural values could have different expectations about justice (Adamovic, 2023; Beugré, 2007; Steiner, 2001; Taras & Rowney, 2008), so their justice evaluations of events and entities would depend on their cultural and national background. To expand cross‐cultural justice research, future research could investigate whether employees from different countries use different justice norms to evaluate justice in the workplace (Adamovic, 2023; Olsen, 2015). This could lead to a more fine‐grained understanding of organizational justice in different countries, increasing our understanding of why employees from different countries react differently to justice.…”
Section: A Research Agenda For Organizational Justice Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%