The Curious Case of the Blasphemer: Ambiguity as Literary Device in Leviticus 24:10-23

Abstract

This article argues that, instead of the nature of the crime or its punishment, the underlying problem that needs oracular law in the account of the blasphemer in Lev 24:10-23 is the ambiguity of the criminal’s identity. This ambiguity is employed in the narrative as a literary device by which the redactor of the narrative introduces the universal applicability of the blasphemy law that includes both natives and foreigners. By so doing, the redactor of Lev 24 serves the Holiness Code’s theological agenda, namely, the extension of holiness to all inhabitants of the land since pollution of the land by any of its inhabitants may eventually cause the expulsion of the whole people from the land. To this end, the redactor rewrites the Covenant Code and frames it with the narrative of the mixed-pedigree blasphemer.

The Concept of Criminal Liability in Several Criminal Issues in Indonesia in Respect to the Political Directions of Corporate Criminal

“…Criminal law politics is primarily concerned with how criminal legislation can be formulated, administered, and utilized as a guide. [18] In addition to comprehension, the concept of criminal politics can also be used to express criminal law politics. Combating crime necessitates a calculated political criminal endeavor (criminal policy).…”

The Alternative Concepts of Blasphemy Law in Indonesia: Legal Comparison with Ireland and Canada

“…Further explanation of these elements is left to the judges to interpret. (Fuad, 2019) The scope of this article can be found in the Elucidation of Law Number 1/PNPS/1965 on Blasphemy Law. It explains that the offence is in essence with the intent to blaspheme or defame the religion.…”

“…It is listed in Article 36(1)b which means that to be prosecuted, someone should consciously perform blasphemous conduct. (Fuad, 2019) Thus, someone that has no intention of being blasphemous should be left out from the prosecution. Furthermore, there is also an exception of expression that cannot be prosecuted for blasphemy.…”