The current state of benchmarking use and networks in facilities management

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to address the knowledge gap on the use of benchmarking techniques as utilized by facilities management (FM) professionals for the purpose of identifying means to improve industry benchmarking practices and guide the direction of future FM benchmarking research.Design/methodology/approachData were collected through surveying 585 FM practitioners representing various countries, organization sizes, types, industries. The data were summarized and analyzed through creating frequency tables, charts, and cross-tabulations. The survey results were compared to a previously published study on benchmarking use to identify the similarities and differences between benchmarking for FM functions vs core business functions.FindingsThe findings indicate that while FM-oriented benchmarking has been adopted at similar levels as other industries, FM-oriented benchmarking tends to be simplistic, lacks a strategic position in the company, often relies upon self-report survey data, is often performed by an individual with no formal benchmarking team and does not utilize process benchmarking or benchmarking networks. These findings emphasize the need for benchmarking education, advocacy for FM as a strategic business partner, the development of verified data sources and networks specifically for the unique greater facilities management field functions.Practical implicationsThese findings provide needed data on the state of FM practitioner use of benchmarking specifically for FM functions in North America. The results can be used as an assessment for the industry, to improve practitioner use and knowledge, and to identify further avenues for academic study.Originality/valueThe value of this study lies in filling in identified knowledge gaps on how FM practitioners are using benchmarking in practice. These data are absent from the research literature and offer the potential to help bridge the academic-practitioner divide to ensure that future research will focus on addressing practitioner needs for the industry.

Complex interplay of R&D, advertising and exports in USA manufacturing firms: differential effects of capabilities

“…In addition, the analytic process provides scientific control mechanisms to managers, particularly with respect to harmonizing multiple resources and setting achievable goals, thereby enhancing managerial proficiency and benchmarking capabilities. In general, benchmarking, as a systematic learning process, encompasses three core steps, such as selecting the target, determining the performance gap and pursuing improvements to fill the gap (Ayabakan et al, 2017;Dodd et al, 2023;Sangwan and Choudhary, 2018;Yang et al, 2015). In this sense, the segmentation of firms into relative capabilities and predicting the potential impact on shareholder value gives managers flexibility in identifying a target group, harmonizing resources and pruning the process to achieve actionable goals (Kwon et al, 2016;Lee et al, 2019).…”

Advanced Sentiment Analysis for Managing and Improving Patient Experience: Application for General Practitioner (GP) Classification in Northamptonshire

“…In process benchmarking, a crucial step is identifying partners and networks. The partners are the units that deliver information regarding benchmarking investigation whilst the networks are established to coordinate operational activities [ 25 ].…”