2018
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.17.19266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Current State of CT Dose Management Across Radiology: Well Intentioned but Not Universally Well Executed

Abstract: Although CT dose awareness campaigns, mandatory standards, and software enhancements are well intentioned, their implementation is often suboptimal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Technical challenges and knowledge gaps encounter the feasibility of effectively implementing dose monitoring and management tools in a clinical practice. Such observation was supported by [ 9 , 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Technical challenges and knowledge gaps encounter the feasibility of effectively implementing dose monitoring and management tools in a clinical practice. Such observation was supported by [ 9 , 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Despite advancements such as dual-energy sources or digital flat panel detectors that allow potential dose reductions of up to 30-60% [62], studies increasingly show that these technologies are often being used to acquire images of higher quality than necessary for diagnosis. At the user-level, technologists at many institutions are relied on to select imaging parameters, which introduces a significant amount of variability in image quality and patient exposure [63]. This individual-level variability has been supported by the finding that sites lacking a dedicated medical physicist and specialist imaging team are less likely to use existing "Dose Check" features [63].…”
Section: Lack Of Optimization By User Despite Better Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the user-level, technologists at many institutions are relied on to select imaging parameters, which introduces a significant amount of variability in image quality and patient exposure [63]. This individual-level variability has been supported by the finding that sites lacking a dedicated medical physicist and specialist imaging team are less likely to use existing "Dose Check" features [63]. The concept of diagnostic reference level has been used to achieve optimization of protection [64,65] despite some concerns about limitation of the concept [66,67].…”
Section: Lack Of Optimization By User Despite Better Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%