1991
DOI: 10.1177/009207039101900408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Current Status of Outcomes Assessment in Marketing Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they are universally used to measure students' performance and often considered to be reliable indicators of students achievement of course objectives (Suskie, 2004). Bacon (2003) emphasized the importance of tests in student's major field referencing a study of program effectiveness by Miller, Chamberlain, and Seay (1991). Miller and colleagues (1991) found that tests in a student's major field was the most useful variable to measure the effectiveness of marketing programs.…”
Section: Student Engagement and Performance In Online Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they are universally used to measure students' performance and often considered to be reliable indicators of students achievement of course objectives (Suskie, 2004). Bacon (2003) emphasized the importance of tests in student's major field referencing a study of program effectiveness by Miller, Chamberlain, and Seay (1991). Miller and colleagues (1991) found that tests in a student's major field was the most useful variable to measure the effectiveness of marketing programs.…”
Section: Student Engagement and Performance In Online Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, professional accreditation agencies such as the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB), the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) and Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) require evidence of student progress towards meeting program-level learning outcomes. This evidence can be provided through various measures, including knowledge-acquisition measures (Nicholoson, Barnett & Dascher, 2005), achievement measures (Miller, Seay & Chamberlain, 1991), student perception measures (Glynn & Rajendran, 1993), and employer and alumni perceptions (Nicholson, et. al., 2005).…”
Section: Outcomes Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%