SAE Technical Paper Series 2003
DOI: 10.4271/2003-01-0426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The DaimlerChrysler Full-Scale Aeroacoustic Wind Tunnel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 summarizes the flow angularity measurements at the nominal front bumper and the model center. The average pitch and yaw angles are very close to zero, which is possible with aid of adjustable nozzle walls [2,3] to account for construction tolerances.…”
Section: Flow Angularitymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 3 summarizes the flow angularity measurements at the nominal front bumper and the model center. The average pitch and yaw angles are very close to zero, which is possible with aid of adjustable nozzle walls [2,3] to account for construction tolerances.…”
Section: Flow Angularitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1. While airline details are always different, the overall philosophy employed in the design of the airline components is the same as in other efforts [1,2,3,4,5]. Fundamentally, the approach is to minimize the circuit footprint (capital cost) while taking extreme care not to create flow separations and other instabilities throughout the circuit, which can then be only partially cleaned up in the flow conditioning section at the cost of increased fan power and circuit length.…”
Section: Airlinementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Audi, Wickern and Lindener (2000); BMW, von Heesen et al (1996); Chrysler, Walter et al (2003); DNW, Mercker and Pengel (1994); Ford (Europe), Volkert and Kohl (1987); Ford (US), Walter et al (2002); GIE S2A, Waudby-Smith et al (2004); Hyundai, Kim et al (2001); IVK/FKFS, Potthof et al (1994), Künstner et al (1995); Pininfarina, Cogotti (2006) Wall treatment is used to achieve two objectives. The first is to provide an anechoic environment within the test section, to create a close-to free-field environment by reducing the reverberation and reflection of sound waves from the noise sources of the vehicle.…”
Section: Aeroacousticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous examples in the literature of test section flow angularity measurements for subsonic and transonic wind tunnels [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], typically performed as part of commissioning activities during the start-up phase after construction or after an upgrade. However, investigations of the causes of flow angularity in the test section are less common.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%