The Dark Side of Self-Affirmation: Confirmation Bias and Illusory Correlation in Response to Threatening Information

Abstract

The effect of self-affirmation on reasoning biases was explored. After participants wrote about a value that was important to them (self-affirmation) or a value that was not important to them (no affirmation), they tested a hypothesis using a task commonly used to study the confirmation bias (Study 1) and assessed correlation from data presented in a 2 x 2 frequency table (Study 2). In both tasks, participants assessed the validity of a hypothesis that had either threatening or nonthreatening implications for their self-concepts. Nonaffirmed participants who tested threatening hypotheses exhibited the confirmation bias less frequently (Study 1) and assessed correlation more accurately (Study 2) than self-affirmed participants or participants who tested nonthreatening hypotheses. Results support models of motivated reasoning that propose that information processing is altered in response to threatening information. By ameliorating the threat, self-affirmations can elicit less effective reasoning strategies.

‘Tell me what I want to hear’: Motivated recall and attributions in media regarding asylum seekers

“…Once an opinion has been formed, it can be difficult to modify; incongruent or oppositional information can decrease the person's motivation and capacity to absorb and interpret information (Kunda & Sinclair, ; Munro & Stansbury, ). This motivational effect can be a drive to reach a certain supposition or to confirm a belief or it can be a tendency to seek out the most correct information in order to form an understanding that reflects the perceived reality of the situation (Kunda, ).…”

The attitude of patients with p‐phenylenediamine or 2,5‐toluenediamine contact allergy to hair dyeing

“…It is remarkable that the acceptance of adverse reactions and the expected adverse reactions after dyeing of hair among the current hair dye users are not similar; current hair dye users accept fewer adverse reactions than they expect. It is possible that threatening information regarding someone's self-image if hair dying is stopped enables the individual to ignore or reduce the significance of this threat, and that a person's thoughts and outcomes of these thoughts are influenced by a preferred conclusion (5,6).…”

The effects of positive patient testimonials on PTSD treatment choice

“…Prior psychotherapy or pharmacotherapy negated this effect of testimonials; thus, the use of testimonials to promote specific treatment options for PTSD is likely to have the greatest effect among those for whom mental health treatment is novel. One possible explanation for this is that individuals give more weight to their own experience and may search for problems or discredit treatment information provided by peers (Munro & Stansbury, 2009). …”