2005
DOI: 10.1075/ni.15.2.07nor
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dark side of tellability

Abstract: This article propounds a revised, two-sided notion of tellability – one which encompasses both the familiar lower-bounding side of tellability as sufficient to warrant listener interest and the generally ignored upper-bounding side where tellability merges into the no longer tellable of impropriety. It demonstrates how tellers and recipients of stories orient to the upper boundary of tellability in various ways, signalling discomfort as they approach the threshold of impropriety, but also conspiring to breech … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
92
0
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
92
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In some respects, this reduces the tellability stakes, as the interviewee is not responsible for the topic and is implicitly allowed space for extended story-telling. At the same time, the setting and questions raise the threshold above which particular details may be 'untellable' in Norrick's (2005) terms. Indeed, several of the responses include detailed descriptions of bodily functions and severe physical symptoms which would be inappropriate to mention in most other contexts.…”
Section: Narratives Professional Identities and Our Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some respects, this reduces the tellability stakes, as the interviewee is not responsible for the topic and is implicitly allowed space for extended story-telling. At the same time, the setting and questions raise the threshold above which particular details may be 'untellable' in Norrick's (2005) terms. Indeed, several of the responses include detailed descriptions of bodily functions and severe physical symptoms which would be inappropriate to mention in most other contexts.…”
Section: Narratives Professional Identities and Our Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, death can be included among the experiences that Norrick (2005) describes as 'untellable', not because they are too mundane to reach the minimum threshold for tellability, but because they are 'too personal, too embarrassing or obscene', and therefore exceed the maximum threshold for tellability in most contexts (Norrick, 2005: 323). According to Norrick, such topics include illness and medical procedures, and taboo topics such as sex and dying.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…question (first discussed by Labov, Storytelling in the Inner City). Indeed, most of the defining features of 'tellability' have been developed on oral storytelling rather than literary narratives (see Labov, 1972;Ochs and Capps, 2001;Norrick, 2005), as well as professional storytelling in legal and journalistic contexts (see Baroni, 2009) and short story structures (see Ryan, 1991).…”
Section: Problems Of Tellability In Germanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tellability, as treated by Ochs and Capps, 'is a narrative dimension that varies from rhetorical focus on a highly reportable breech of expectations and its eventual consequences (high tellability) to reporting relatively ordinary events (low tellability) ' (p. 76). In this regard, Norrick (2005) proposes a two-sided notion of tellability. That is, one that encompasses the familiar lower-bounding side of this phenomenon as sufficient to warrant listener interest and the generally ignored upperbounding side where tellability merges into the no longer tellable because they are too personal, too embarrassing, or too frightening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following extract from one of the interviews with Jamie provides a flavour of this narrative in action (see also Smith and Sparkes, 2008 When we present Jamie's life to various audiences using selections from his own words as given above, we sense the anxiety, discomfort, and fear it instils in them and their need, at times, to respond to the story. We get a sense that we are relaying a story that due to its content is at Norrick's (2005) upper-bounding side of tellability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%