2006
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The DART imaging and CaT survey of the Fornax dwarf spheroidal galaxy

Abstract: Aims. As part of the DART project we have used the ESO/2.2m Wide Field Imager in conjunction with the VLT/FLAMES GIRAFFE spectrograph to study the detailed properties of the resolved stellar population of the Fornax dwarf spheroidal galaxy out to and beyond its tidal radius. Fornax dwarf spheroidal galaxy has had a complicated evolution and contains significant numbers of young, intermediate age and old stars. We investigate the relation between these different components by studying their photometric, kinemat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

70
525
4
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 307 publications
(600 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
70
525
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These gradients are particularly clear in some galaxies and, when accompanied by correlated differences in kinematics and metallicity, are often interpreted as evidence for distinct stellar components. The Sculptor dSph makes a compelling example of a system with at least two distinct components (Tolstoy et al 2004;Battaglia et al 2008), but so do other dwarfs such as Sextans (Battaglia et al 2011); the And II companion to M31 (McConnachie et al 2007;Amorisco et al 2014); and Fornax (Battaglia et al 2006;Walker & Peñarrubia 2011). We note, however, that clear-cut evidence for distinct components is often weak, and that these may also be interpreted as simply cases where the radial gradients are particularly pronounced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These gradients are particularly clear in some galaxies and, when accompanied by correlated differences in kinematics and metallicity, are often interpreted as evidence for distinct stellar components. The Sculptor dSph makes a compelling example of a system with at least two distinct components (Tolstoy et al 2004;Battaglia et al 2008), but so do other dwarfs such as Sextans (Battaglia et al 2011); the And II companion to M31 (McConnachie et al 2007;Amorisco et al 2014); and Fornax (Battaglia et al 2006;Walker & Peñarrubia 2011). We note, however, that clear-cut evidence for distinct components is often weak, and that these may also be interpreted as simply cases where the radial gradients are particularly pronounced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Top arrows indicate the projected half-mass radius of each component; the rest of the arrows show the same, but for the other simulated dwarfs (profiles not shown). The arrows labelled "Fornax" correspond to the half-number radii of the intermediate-age and older populations derived by Battaglia et al (2006). Note that the old/metal-poor component is always less centrally concentrated than their young/metal-rich counterpart.…”
Section: The Simulated Dwarfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Battaglia et al 2006Battaglia et al , 2011, and nearby field dwarfs such as KKH37 and DDO6 (Weisz et al 2011). The best studied examples indicate that the two components differ not only in age, but also in their metallicity, spatial distribution, and kinematics (Walker & Peñarrubia 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We finally stress that our model envisages a central depression in the radial distribution of the stellar velocity dispersion (Marcolini et al 2008). This naturally entails two different stellar populations with an anti-correlation between [Fe/H] and velocity dispersion, which has been observed in the case of the Sculptor dSph (Tolstoy et al 2004) and the Fornax dSph (Battaglia et al 2006). …”
Section: Comparison With Local Dsphsmentioning
confidence: 86%