2020
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The data processing pipeline for the MUSE instrument

Abstract: The processing of raw data from modern astronomical instruments is often carried out nowadays using dedicated software, known as pipelines, largely run in automated operation. In this paper we describe the data reduction pipeline of the Multi Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE) integral field spectrograph operated at the ESO Paranal Observatory. This spectrograph is a complex machine: it records data of 1152 separate spatial elements on detectors in its 24 integral field units. Efficiently handling such data re… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
250
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 314 publications
(250 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
250
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the UDG candidate MATLAS-2019 we requested 12 observation blocks (OBs) with the Multi-unit spectroscopic explorer (MUSE) mounted at the Very Large Telescope at Cerro Paranal, of which 3 were taken in Period 103 (PI: Francine Marleau) under program 0103.B-0635. The data were reduced via the MUSE pipeline (Weilbacher et al 2020) wrapped within the pymusepipe python package pymusepipe 1 (Emsellem et al 2019), which was previously used to reduce MUSE data taken for the UDG NGC 1052-DF2. This pipeline takes all raw data available in the European Southern Observatory science archive and produces a combined and calibrated (i.e., bias and flat-field…”
Section: Observations Data Reduction and Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the UDG candidate MATLAS-2019 we requested 12 observation blocks (OBs) with the Multi-unit spectroscopic explorer (MUSE) mounted at the Very Large Telescope at Cerro Paranal, of which 3 were taken in Period 103 (PI: Francine Marleau) under program 0103.B-0635. The data were reduced via the MUSE pipeline (Weilbacher et al 2020) wrapped within the pymusepipe python package pymusepipe 1 (Emsellem et al 2019), which was previously used to reduce MUSE data taken for the UDG NGC 1052-DF2. This pipeline takes all raw data available in the European Southern Observatory science archive and produces a combined and calibrated (i.e., bias and flat-field…”
Section: Observations Data Reduction and Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data reduction was performed using the MUSE pipeline (version 1.6.2, Weilbacher et al 2012Weilbacher et al , 2016 under the ES-OREFLEX environment (Freudling et al 2013). In summary, the data reduction involved bias and overscan subtraction, flat fielding, wavelength calibration, determination of the line spread function, illumination correction with twilight flats (to account for large-scale variation of the illumination of the detectors) and similar with lamp flats (to correct for edge effects between the integral-field units).…”
Section: Fcc Common Namementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the observing runs the average seeing was nearly constant with a FWHM of about 1.6 . The reduction of the data and the construction of the final calibrated data cubes were carried out within the ESO REFLEX environment (Freudling et al 2013) using the standard MUSE Data Reduction Software (version 2.4.2) (Weilbacher et al 2012(Weilbacher et al , 2016. Sky residuals were removed from the final data cube by using MUSE-ZAP (v.2.2) (Soto et al 2016).…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%