2013
DOI: 10.1515/psicl-2013-0018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dative alternation in Danish and Polish – A learners perspective

Abstract: Three experiments investigating how two groups of adult Polish learners of Danish as a foreign language acquire the Danish dative alternation are reported. Experiment 1 is a speeded acceptability judgment task, which shows that Group 1 has the same pattern as native speakers i.e. slower responses to the dispreffered new-given NP-constructions, but no givenness effect with the PP-constructions. Experiment 2 shows that Group 2 also have acquired this pattern, even though earlier research suggests that the givenn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of original order on change is on the other hand very strong and the result is very clear: Indefinite–definite items are almost always altered (only in five cases is the indefinite–definite pattern retained), and the definite–indefinite items are never altered into the indefinite–definite pattern, and only changed at all in four of the cases (see Table 3 above). This is in line with the aforementioned studies that report a processing disadvantage for post-verbal indefinite–definite orders in the double object construction in Danish (Kizach & Balling 2013, Kizach & Vikner published online 21 March 2016; see also Kizach & Mathiasen 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The effect of original order on change is on the other hand very strong and the result is very clear: Indefinite–definite items are almost always altered (only in five cases is the indefinite–definite pattern retained), and the definite–indefinite items are never altered into the indefinite–definite pattern, and only changed at all in four of the cases (see Table 3 above). This is in line with the aforementioned studies that report a processing disadvantage for post-verbal indefinite–definite orders in the double object construction in Danish (Kizach & Balling 2013, Kizach & Vikner published online 21 March 2016; see also Kizach & Mathiasen 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%