1970
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(70)90733-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The decay of 151Gd to the levels of 151Eu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

1973
1973
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present decay data are listed in Table 2. We have observed five new y-rays and the intensity of the 239 keV y-ray to be much smaller than quoted earlier [21,23,24]. This implicates for the 239 keV transiton the M1 characterisation.…”
Section: Experimental Technique and Resultscontrasting
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present decay data are listed in Table 2. We have observed five new y-rays and the intensity of the 239 keV y-ray to be much smaller than quoted earlier [21,23,24]. This implicates for the 239 keV transiton the M1 characterisation.…”
Section: Experimental Technique and Resultscontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…Two PK-ratios were measured in this decay. We have investigated the K-capture branches feeding the 354 and 243 keV states in 151Eu by comparing the 354 [23] and 243 keV ),-ray intensities. We also investigated the Kcapture to the 350 and 243 keV states in ~SlEu.…”
Section: Experimental Technique and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Salem et al 1974) QEC value from Auble (1971b ' Marelius(1967), 0. 750+0:0,10 16 Adarnowcz ('9,68, 0.9 +0' 0Z 13 ' Vatai(1968a) Ford (1970).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus an op- portunity exists here for comparing the allowed and forbidden transitions in the same nucleus. Using the theoretical dependence of PK on the decay energy, QEc, for an allowed transition, one can also determine Qec to a better accuracy than in the earlier determinations [4]. The measurement of PK in the transition to the 307.4 keV level is also utilized in the present study to establish that the spin of the level is 7/2 unambiguously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%