Proceedings Fourth International Symposium on Advanced Research in Asynchronous Circuits and Systems
DOI: 10.1109/async.1998.666498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The design of an asynchronous TinyRISC/sup TM/ TR4101 microprocessor core

Abstract: This paper presents the design of an asynchronous version of the TR4101 embedded microprocessor core developed by LSI Logic Inc. The asynchronous processor, called ARISC, was designed using the same CAD tools and the same standard c ell library that was used to implement the TR4101.The paper reports on the design methodology, the architecture, the implementation, and the performance of the ARISC. This includes a comparison with the TR4101, and a detailed b r eakdown of the power consumption in the ARISC.ARISC … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The routers and links are designed by asynchronous circuits, where request-acknowledge based handshaking is operated, while the processing cores are designed by synchronous circuits. The asynchronous circuits are classified into a bundled-data style [3], and the QDI logic style [4]- [6]. Since the QDI logic style avoids any timing constraints with an only assumption, where the wires at fanout point must have roughly equal delay, robust asynchronous circuits can be implemented under variations, such as process and voltage variations, while the bundled-data style requires timing margins, such as the synchronous circuits.…”
Section: A Global Asynchronous Communication In Gals-noc Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The routers and links are designed by asynchronous circuits, where request-acknowledge based handshaking is operated, while the processing cores are designed by synchronous circuits. The asynchronous circuits are classified into a bundled-data style [3], and the QDI logic style [4]- [6]. Since the QDI logic style avoids any timing constraints with an only assumption, where the wires at fanout point must have roughly equal delay, robust asynchronous circuits can be implemented under variations, such as process and voltage variations, while the bundled-data style requires timing margins, such as the synchronous circuits.…”
Section: A Global Asynchronous Communication In Gals-noc Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asynchronous VLSI design has been gaining a new popularity since the end of the 80's. Representative results in asynchronous microprocessor design have been achieved [6,7,8,9,10,11,14,15]. Most designs address high performance with reduced power consumption, and utilize specialized techniques which involve layout topology and physical delay assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Unlike the clockless stochastic decoder, the hardware implementation of the asynchronous circuits have been presented [25]- [27]. A wire-delay dependent (WDD) scheduling algorithm is the extension of the WDI scheduling algorithm in order to lower the error floors.…”
Section: Wdd Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%