ISIE 2001. 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8570)
DOI: 10.1109/isie.2001.931570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The design of PIDA controller with pre-compensator [for induction motors]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of them are made for proportional-integrative-derivative-accelerative (PIDA) controllers (PID 2 n ). The controller structure is either 1 degree of freedom (1-DOF) [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] or 2 degrees of freedom (2-DOF) [21][22][23] which can optimise the tracking and control performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of them are made for proportional-integrative-derivative-accelerative (PIDA) controllers (PID 2 n ). The controller structure is either 1 degree of freedom (1-DOF) [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] or 2 degrees of freedom (2-DOF) [21][22][23] which can optimise the tracking and control performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the fact that several dead time elements of a control loop may be replaced by their sum without changing the corresponding optimal controller tuning, first ITP based on the delay equivalence (22) may be formulated as follows: Theorem 2 (Nearly homogeneous shape properties under ITP-Te with T e = const): ITP considering some T e = const > 0 (24) guarantees in a broad range of the parameters m and n = m + 2 nearly ideal shapes of the transients at the plant input and output with the speed of transients increasing with m and decreasing with T e . A simple verification of the ITP-Te with T e = const may be based on comparing the expected IAE do values (14) corresponding to T d (23) for the chosen m and T e with IAE d values (1) achieved by loop simulation. The simulated results ( Figure 1) enable two conclusions:…”
Section: A Itp-tementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Son yıllarda, yüksek dereceli sistemlerin kontrolü için önerilen yöntemlerden biri de 1996'da Jung ve Dorf tarafından sunulan PIDA denetçilerdir. Bu sistemlerde PIDA denetçilerin PID'ye göre daha etkin cevap verdiği birçok çalışmada ileri sürülmektedir [3,4]. Bu denetçilerin kolay kullanımının yanında bazı zayıf yanları da hala bulunmaktadır.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified