Abstract:Monoclonal antibody-based competitive ELISA (C-ELISA) has been used for the specific measurement of antibodies to peste des petits ruminants (PPR) viruses in sheep, goats, cattle and buffalo. Serum samples from sheep (n = 232), goats (n = 428), cattle (n = 43), buffalo (n = 89) were tested. The animals had not been vaccinated against rinderpest or PPR. Findings suggested that the sero-positive cases were significantly higher in sheep (51.29%) than in goats (39.02%) (P = 0.002). The overall sero-prevalence of P… Show more
“…A difference in the neutralising PPR antibodies in the sheep may be sensitivity to PPR virus, which was correlated to breed because sheep only suffer mild to inapparent infection rather than to the virus, was reported among various with the virus or this may be attributed to a higher breeds of goats [22,23]. PPR is the singular most recovery rate and a greater longevity of sheep verses important cause of morbidity and mortality among goats which is similar to the serological profile small ruminants, for which the most effective form of reported earlier by some workers [30,31,32]. Some protection is through vaccination or an eventful workers have reported a PPR outbreak in a flock of recovery from natural infection.…”
Background: Recent changes in the host range of peste des petits ruminants (PPR) virus coupled with the presence of a huge ruminant population in the study area has stimulated our interest to carry out a sero-survey for PPR among the different domestic ruminant populations of semi-arid region of North-eastern (NE) Nigeria.
Materials and Methods:The prevalence of PPR virus antibodies among domestic animals (goat, sheep, cattle and camel) populations in NE Nigeria was studied using virus neutralisation test (VNT) and competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (c-ELISA).Results: An overall seroprevalence of 57% and 55% were revealed using VNT and c-ELISA, respectively. Significant difference (p<0.05) in the prevalence of PPR antibodies was noted between the different species of animals tested. Highest seroprevalence of 76.5% was found in sheep followed by a decreasing order of prevalence in goat 51.6%, camels 27.8% and cattle 16.7%. Similar pattern of prevalence was noted when the sera were tested for PPR using c-ELISA antibody. There was no significant difference in the sensitivity of both the procedures (VNT and c-ELISA) when used for the detection of PPR antibody in test sera. However, differences were noted in their specificity based on the degree of cross reactivity between PPR and rinderpest (RP) antibodies. Higher percentage of PPR positive sera (goats 64.8% and sheep 63.8%) cross-reacted with RP virus in VNT. None of the PPR positive sera from cattle and camels cross-reacted with RP virus in VNT and c-ELISA. Significant difference in gender and age was noted in the prevalence of PPR antibody among goats and sheep. Specificall, higher prevalence was found in females and the seroprevalence increased with age among the different age groups of goats studied. Analysis of the seasonal distribution of prevalence of PPR antibody in positive samples did not reveal any significant difference between seasons.
Conclusion:We conclude that PPR virus is actively circulating among the ruminant and dromedary populations and that the infection may be endemic in the study area. Significant findings from our study indicate that cattle and camel could play a key role in the epidemiology of PPR, especially in areas like the one under this study where small ruminants are reared alongside cattle and/or camels. Further studies are necessary to fully elucidate, the pivotal roles of cattle and camel in the transmission cycle of PPR virus.
“…A difference in the neutralising PPR antibodies in the sheep may be sensitivity to PPR virus, which was correlated to breed because sheep only suffer mild to inapparent infection rather than to the virus, was reported among various with the virus or this may be attributed to a higher breeds of goats [22,23]. PPR is the singular most recovery rate and a greater longevity of sheep verses important cause of morbidity and mortality among goats which is similar to the serological profile small ruminants, for which the most effective form of reported earlier by some workers [30,31,32]. Some protection is through vaccination or an eventful workers have reported a PPR outbreak in a flock of recovery from natural infection.…”
Background: Recent changes in the host range of peste des petits ruminants (PPR) virus coupled with the presence of a huge ruminant population in the study area has stimulated our interest to carry out a sero-survey for PPR among the different domestic ruminant populations of semi-arid region of North-eastern (NE) Nigeria.
Materials and Methods:The prevalence of PPR virus antibodies among domestic animals (goat, sheep, cattle and camel) populations in NE Nigeria was studied using virus neutralisation test (VNT) and competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (c-ELISA).Results: An overall seroprevalence of 57% and 55% were revealed using VNT and c-ELISA, respectively. Significant difference (p<0.05) in the prevalence of PPR antibodies was noted between the different species of animals tested. Highest seroprevalence of 76.5% was found in sheep followed by a decreasing order of prevalence in goat 51.6%, camels 27.8% and cattle 16.7%. Similar pattern of prevalence was noted when the sera were tested for PPR using c-ELISA antibody. There was no significant difference in the sensitivity of both the procedures (VNT and c-ELISA) when used for the detection of PPR antibody in test sera. However, differences were noted in their specificity based on the degree of cross reactivity between PPR and rinderpest (RP) antibodies. Higher percentage of PPR positive sera (goats 64.8% and sheep 63.8%) cross-reacted with RP virus in VNT. None of the PPR positive sera from cattle and camels cross-reacted with RP virus in VNT and c-ELISA. Significant difference in gender and age was noted in the prevalence of PPR antibody among goats and sheep. Specificall, higher prevalence was found in females and the seroprevalence increased with age among the different age groups of goats studied. Analysis of the seasonal distribution of prevalence of PPR antibody in positive samples did not reveal any significant difference between seasons.
Conclusion:We conclude that PPR virus is actively circulating among the ruminant and dromedary populations and that the infection may be endemic in the study area. Significant findings from our study indicate that cattle and camel could play a key role in the epidemiology of PPR, especially in areas like the one under this study where small ruminants are reared alongside cattle and/or camels. Further studies are necessary to fully elucidate, the pivotal roles of cattle and camel in the transmission cycle of PPR virus.
“…Specific antigen could be detected in the unvaccinated control animals after challenge but not from any of the immunized goats. The antibody titres against PPR in cattle and buffalo have also been reported by Khan et al (2008). Therefore, it is suggested that, within villages where PPR vaccination is administered in small ruminants, cattle in close contact with sheep/goats could be considered sentinel animals and could be sampled for evidence of seroconversion.…”
A total of 70 sheep and 330 goats were selected randomly. All the animals were kept under same housing and management conditions. Serum samples were collected from all the animals and tested for the presence of antibodies against Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) virus using competitive ELISA (cELISA). All the animals were found negative showing percentage inhibition (PI) values <50. The animals were vaccinated against PPR with Nig/75/1 strain vaccine of PPR Serum samples were collected from randomly selected 12 sheep and 30 goats at 10, 30 and 45 days post-vaccination. The samples were subjected to cELISA to determine the presence of antibodies against PPRV. The samples with PI >50 were considered as sero-positive. The sheep found positive at 10, 30 and 45 days post-vaccination were 1(8.3%), 7(58.3%) and 12(100%) respectively. In case of goats 3(10.0%), 29(96.6%) and 27(90.0%) animals gave positive results at 10, 30 and 45 days post-vaccination respectively. Mean PI values in sheep at 10, 30 and 45 days post-vaccination were recorded as 37, 65 and 91 respectively, whereas in goats these values were 43, 78 and 86 respectively.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.