2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1049.2012.00177.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Determinants of Corruption: Cross‐Country‐Panel‐Data Analysis

Abstract: This study explores the determinants of corruption, utilizing the Hausman and Taylor's technique to estimate a random effects model that incorporates both the effects of corruption determinants that vary over time and those that are time-invariant, and using a larger panel dataset and a comprehensive set of corruption determinants.The first interesting result is that perception of strong support for rule of law is strongly correlated with reduced corruption, suggesting that a better quality of law enforcement … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
75
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
10
75
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been noted that there are 3000 titles of articles investigating corruption afterward, and more than 500 articles specifically discuss corruption in the perspective of economics (Mishra, 2005). Ideas regarding the study of economics of corruption are mostly classified into three main factors of corruption: (1) economic factors; (2) political factors; and (3) social and cultural factors (Sandholtz & Koetzle, 2000;Nwabuzor, 2005;Akcay, 2006;Pellegrini & Gerlagh, 2008;Billger & Goel, 2009;Ata & Arvas, 2011;Agbiboa, 2011;Aggrey, 2012;Elbahnasawy & Revier, 2012;Dong & Torgler, 2013;Pieroni & d'Agostino, 2013). In addition, the study of economics of corruption in its development can be traced from some studies finding out the effects of corruption toward economy activities, such as (1) the effects of corruption to real GDP (Mauro, 1996;Leite & Weidman, 1999;Tanzi & Davoodi, 2000;Abed & Davoodi, 2000); (2) the effects of corruption to international trade (Anderson & Marcouiller, 2002;De Groot et al, 2004;Wei, 2000a); (3) the effects of corruption to government expenditure (Mauro, 1998); (4) the effects of corruption to government revenue (Tanzi & Davoodi, 2000); (5) the effects of corruption to the interest of investment (Henisz, 2000;Wei, 2000;Wei & Javorcik, 2002); (6) the effects of corruption to the distribution of income and poverty (Husted, 1999); and (7) the effects of corruption to inflation (Al-Mahrubi, 2000).…”
Section: Definition Of Corruption and Economics Of Corruptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been noted that there are 3000 titles of articles investigating corruption afterward, and more than 500 articles specifically discuss corruption in the perspective of economics (Mishra, 2005). Ideas regarding the study of economics of corruption are mostly classified into three main factors of corruption: (1) economic factors; (2) political factors; and (3) social and cultural factors (Sandholtz & Koetzle, 2000;Nwabuzor, 2005;Akcay, 2006;Pellegrini & Gerlagh, 2008;Billger & Goel, 2009;Ata & Arvas, 2011;Agbiboa, 2011;Aggrey, 2012;Elbahnasawy & Revier, 2012;Dong & Torgler, 2013;Pieroni & d'Agostino, 2013). In addition, the study of economics of corruption in its development can be traced from some studies finding out the effects of corruption toward economy activities, such as (1) the effects of corruption to real GDP (Mauro, 1996;Leite & Weidman, 1999;Tanzi & Davoodi, 2000;Abed & Davoodi, 2000); (2) the effects of corruption to international trade (Anderson & Marcouiller, 2002;De Groot et al, 2004;Wei, 2000a); (3) the effects of corruption to government expenditure (Mauro, 1998); (4) the effects of corruption to government revenue (Tanzi & Davoodi, 2000); (5) the effects of corruption to the interest of investment (Henisz, 2000;Wei, 2000;Wei & Javorcik, 2002); (6) the effects of corruption to the distribution of income and poverty (Husted, 1999); and (7) the effects of corruption to inflation (Al-Mahrubi, 2000).…”
Section: Definition Of Corruption and Economics Of Corruptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The essential role of the quality of institutions in preventing corruption has been highlighted in several studies (Hunady, 2017;Dreher et al, 2009; Mocan, 2008; Sööt & Rootalu, 2012). The rule of law is often reported as the crucial variable related to institutions and their effect on corruption (Elbahnasawy & Revier, 2012;Kim, 2014;Iwasaki and Suzuki, 2012). With respect to this issue Andrés & Goel (2011) argue that the higher levels of corruption are also correlated with higher levels of software piracy in the country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another data issue comes from the Rodrik critique (Rodrik, 2012) which points out that policy indicators are not independent random variables, but conscious and strategic decisions made by governments in an attempt to obtain specific goals. Thus, the choice of development indicators as exogenous variables might not 7 On one hand, several cross-country studies find a significant RoL coefficient (Ades and Tella, 1997;Leite and Weidmann, 1999;Broadman and Recanatini, 2001;Brunetti and Weder, 2003;Herzfeld and Weiss, 2003;Ali and Isse, 2002;Park, 2003;Damania et al, 2004;Croix and Delavallade, 2011;Iwasaki and Suzuki, 2012;de Mendonça and da Fonseca, 2012;Elbahnasawy and Revier, 2012). On the other, others find significant coefficients among alternative governance indicators; some related to current policies (e.g., government effectiveness, decentralization, freedom of the press, federal system, women in parliament, etc.)…”
Section: Econometric Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%